web analytics

Anna Nicole Smith Estate. Better In The Bahamas?

by QV on 11/15/2007

in Anna Nicole Smith, Uncategorized

bahamas.jpgJust got done reading a news letter from www.sovereignsociety.com. Their legal counsel and senior writer is Bob Bauman. Bauman’s most recent article is “Is It Really Better In The Bahamas”?

If you are not familiar with the Sovereign Society, the quickest way to describe them is as a group of experts that sell advice, discoveries and observations concerning wealth attainment, preservation and privacy. Most of their offerings concern “offshore” as in not in the United States.

Anna Nicole fans may be interested to know some facts concerning U.S. treaties with the Bahamas.

Back in a Simpler Time – Pre 2000

Once upon a time, The Bahamas was known as one of the primary offshore tax havens. The Bahamas boasted strict financial and banking secrecy. It still imposes little or no taxes on foreign investors and bank account holders – but other things have changed.

Four years ago next month, I got a reaction in the Bahamian news media with an article in this space entitled: “The Bahamas: 51st State?”

We were flattered that the Bahamians active in the offshore financial community cared enough about The Sovereign Society’s opinion to take note of that particular A-Letter.

What caused a stir was my opinion about The Bahamas parliament approval of a Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA) with the United States in December, 2003. This was the very treaty that The Bahamas had resisted for many decades.

The TIEA allows the exchange of tax information about Americans with Bahamian accounts. Plus, it applies to all criminal and civil tax matters. I went on to say that the TIEA was another nail in the coffin for The Bahamas lasting as an offshore financial center for Americans.

During the 20th century, these islands off the southeast coast of America blossomed into a major tax and asset protection haven. It was especially useful for citizens of the nearby United States. This island nation offered foreigners tax exemption. The Bahamas also had a series of well-crafted laws allowing international business corporations (IBCs), trusts, offshore banks and insurance – all wrapped in maximum financial privacy, strictly protected by law.

Then in December 2000, the Free National Movement (FNM) government, (currently back in power since May 2007 elections), passed what some locals called the “11 bills of Christmas.” In just one month, they managed to seriously weaken offshore financial and banking laws – especially in all aspects of privacy.

The government wrote many of these laws with the advice of U.S. government “advisors” from the U.S. Treasury and the IRS who were all sent to pressure the Nassau government.

You can read the entire article at http://www.sovereignsociety.com/offshore2363.html

Sphere: Related Content

{ 9 comments }

1 Mish November 15, 2007 at 2:03 PM

There still the “white sandy beaches”…….LOL

2 QV November 15, 2007 at 4:31 PM

As I look at the beautiful multi colored leaves falling from the trees and getting rained on in 41 degree weather. Heck yeah! Lets go to the white sandy beaches :-)

3 bluberry November 15, 2007 at 10:06 PM

BUT WE HAVE TO RAKE OUR LEAVES FIRST, RIGHT? i WONDER IF MOST OF THE BEACHES ARE PUBLIC, OR ARE THE BEST ONES TAKEN BY THE MANSIONS

4 freida November 15, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Tell me about those leaves, I have an 80 ft. oak tree, LOL.
I’ve been to the Bahamas, and it’s a paradise.
Especially to those like me, I guess, that were raised in ‘The South’…close to salt water and palm trees, and mangroves, and ‘crystal white sandy beaches,’ as fine as baby powder.
Seems you don’t know what you have ’til it’s gone…and I should have invested in Real Estate long ago, LOL.
Don’t worry be happy!!!

5 freida November 16, 2007 at 1:44 AM

No matter how ‘White’ or ‘Republican’ I may be, this woman is wise…

http://www.house.gov/waters/

6 freida November 16, 2007 at 1:55 AM

It’s OKay to please yourself as long as you ‘use’ the proper channels, LOL.
Wasn’t she the one?

7 freida November 16, 2007 at 2:19 AM

There’s a time and place for everything…and the Oval Office is the place for business not pleasure, no matter how much time you have, or ‘he’ had, ‘on his hands.’
Just a humble opinion, LOL.
Guess men will be men…so don’t trust that they’re ‘working,’ LOL.

Guess Hilliary doesn’t have what it takes to discuss ‘This Issue.’

Does ‘she’ have what it takes to represent US?

Of course, she’s just a ‘figure head’ a ‘face’ and ‘others’ are behind her…men!!!

The Middle East will not respect her…she is not a Lady, IMHO.
Neither is Condi Rice…
And, she should have been ousted right after 9/11.

So, what’s going on?

8 freida November 29, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I don’t think Anna needed this ‘haven’ except as a true haven…I’m pretty sure Howard ain’t no dummy and had plenty enough sense to have good bookkeepers and accountants…and investments.
On the other hand, I do believe GBT and Shelly needed this ‘haven’ for their real estate ‘ventures’ and drug money, and all that laundry over the years.

Well, of course, I don’t think they were as smart as Howard and his ‘team.’

Now I may be wrong, and often am, LOL.

But I don’t think GBT or Shelly, have a law degree…or really good people in high places working for them…maybe bad people working in high places, though…LOL

Of course, I could be wrong.

9 freida December 8, 2007 at 12:10 AM

Answer to title: YES!!!

Especially this time of year.

Bet, ‘Anna’ had established residency in the Bahamas many years ago.

Bet, we just don’t no diddly, didily, didley, or didlie…LOL.

Squat!!!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

MySpace Tracker http://legalbudsz.com/sitemap_index.xml