web analytics

The Truth And Nothing But…

by QV on 01/18/2008

in Anna Nicole Smith, Bonnie Stern, Howard K Stern, Krista Barth, Lin Wood, QV, Virgie Arthur

Part V

When I look back through all the emails and the reactions of the loyal members, I feel great sadness. They were caught in the middle of some kind of shakedown and I did not know what to do about it. I received so many emails wanting to know what went on.

It was awhile before I could even put into words the betrayal that I felt but it was not only for me but for the people that had worked so hard and showed their dedication in so many ways.

I asked some of the members if they were ever told “thank you” when they sent their research to whomever and they said no.

I tried to explain that false accusations were made and I felt that their work had been taken for granted and was being used to put a feather in someone else’s cap. All the discoveries so far had pointed in that direction.

But more was to follow. My moderator “H” was exchanging emails with some of the members who copied me on them. I had not spoken to her because I felt at the time that she was part of something that was injurious to everything that had been accomplished by the site so far.

Also, methodically being taken out of the picture and besmirched was another blogger that had written many fine articles for Howard’s cause and the man that supplied the video. I know no other reason other than because they were my friends and believed in me. They knew the time and dedication it took and they also knew that the site was unique and valuable for Stern’s cause.

The only thing that I knew to do was to share the email exchange of April 19th with members that emailed me and wait and see what else transpired.

The next day “R” wrote to me “You win, you just blew any protection I might have had under the “Attorney Work Product”. I provided one small piece in this puzzle, nothing more, but because of your inflaming emails, I am now leaving the project all together. It saddens me not to be able to help Howard, and especially Dannielynn. But in the end with all of the emails you have sent out and me taking stock in how I might out maneuver what you are saying, sadly I can’t. So “QV” you won, but was it worth the price?”

I have received numerous emails this morning with a LOT of insults from you directed to me which is fine I have a tough skin.

But now you are saying what you are in multiple emails to people, you have crossed the line. You have said over and over agin “R” has a direct line to Krista Barth and because of some of the work “R” is doing, she thinks she is…… I would not even type some of the words you have said about me.”

I don’t know what those words were. That was because up until that point, I shared the emails without much commentary as I did not know how to describe what went on and I did not understand why. At one point, I went into the chat room and told those present that their research was not being credited to them and it was being used by people that seemed to relish in rubbing shoulders with the attorneys and the Stern family. At any cost.

Also, I think “R” was mistaken concerning who was writing about having a “direct line to Krista Barth”. It was her buddy “H”.

I received emails from many members that stated that from what they saw in the emails and some that they received from “H” later that they felt that “R” and “H” were trying to glorify themselves.

One from “H” said “the ones that have offered information are in the know that I have a direct line to the lawyers”. I have emails from the researching members saying that they knew no such thing.

“H” also sent a mass email to members who she had email addresses for stating:

QV is well aware that ALL the information that has been passed on to me goes to Krista Barths assistant. There is a beautiful open door policy between us and if it weren’t for the workings of many members on this site much of the information would never have seen the top of her desk.” And another:
“and have nurtured a beautiful friendship with Bonnie Stern”

No, I was not “aware” of that at all. I thought what “H” collected from members went to “R” who then passed it on. I did know that she was in contact with Bonnie Stern but I did not know they had a “beautiful friendship”.

Other email from “H” contained more comments and accusations:

“IN MY OPINION, I think QV made a poor choice to reveal something she KNEW was sensitive, and that her motives on the outside could be viewed as “limelight” seeking, or maybe she just wanted to be the first to air it… but sadly all the work that has been involved in protecting dannielynn can not be jeopardized by another who is not on the same page.”

As stated before, I did not previously know anything about this “sensitive” information. That is what started the controversy. And it was my opinion that as my moderator, “H” should have told me these things which would have prevented the ensuing misunderstandings and hurt that also involved the members.

In a subsequent communication, she told me that she was under the assumption that the video man was to keep me up to speed. I really can not agree with the logic of that assumption since “H” was the moderator of my site and was expected to report all goings on.

“H” also passed the following email from “R” to her list culled from my site with a subject line that should have been sent to all, long before. I guess “R” decided not to resign after all.

Subject: “Please say thank you”.

Dear “H”,

For security reasons I need you to not show my email addy, but for the ppl sending you things… please thank them, in fact copy and paste this email to them minus my email addy.

They all seem to understand the Attorney work product, and they all seem to be doing a great job with you as the hub for for (sic?).

Thanks is just not enough, however the money they are saving Howard on legal fees is amazing, and because of their work and what was provided it is my understanding that is what got Howard, Lin Wood to represent him. No one person can do this..

Sadly the things you have forwarded to me today never made it to the in-box prior to today…. I wished they had…

Please tell your researchers it is because of the work they do that all of our faith in man kind and the goodness that can be there by people that care enough to give of their own time here.

The Stern family is more grateful then any of them know…

Have a great evening and again minus my email addy, please extend my sincere thank to all of them…”R”.

The part about things not reaching “R’s” mailbox could indicate that she was expecting everything to go through her I suppose. I also took it as a dig on the “video man”. He had received a phone message from “R” making childish accusations and accusing him of “leaking”. He was furious too. Later on he was accused by Bonnie of claiming to be an attorney. Wonder who started that rumor?

Accusations by “R” that work done by my members was not getting to her email box may have been correct but they were certainly getting to the attorneys and that dig by “R” was shown to be a ploy to shove “VM” out of the picture as well. It eventually worked.

In the meantime, “VM” continued to send things to Krista Barth’s office and eventually developed his own contact at Lin Wood’s office with attorney Ben Erwin. His video was stored on my web server and it was password protected, with the password given to the attorneys and the Stern family but after the fallout, I did not want “R” having access to my site anymore.

However it is my belief from subsequent comments made to “VM” by “R” and the number of logins by untraceable IP addresses that Bonnie was giving her the password anyway. Even though only video was there.

On April 21st, I sent an email to Bonnie Stern with an explanation of what was going on. On April 22nd, I discovered that “R” and “H” had opened their own website.

At that time, I had not heard back from Bonnie. The members of the site that I was not in email contact with wanted answers. So I wrote a short version of what I have written here. This thing had caused so much turmoil and I still did not understand why it happened. I remember it was 6AM in the morning on April 24th and I had been up all night and still could not find the words to tell the members what had happened. I finally had to ask for help from a friend.

In reply to my posting to the members, I received an email from “R”. She told me to be very careful and not to forget that I had tried to sell something to People Magazine.

That was news to me. I guess that was another reason why I was being called a “media whore” and “seeking the limelight and media attention”. “Untrustworthy” and “unwholesome” were thrown in for good measure. And don’t forget. All of these accusations and turmoil came from the publication of one article about Virgie Arthur’s family tree.

“R” also cited a 2006 federal law about using your real name on blogs. The rest of the email said, “And yes I have a ton of very defaming emails about what you are spreading to ppl and on your blog they just keep tumbling in my email box about ALL you want is hits on your site, fame and you do not care about Howard…. QV, you took a wrong somewhere and lost site of what your blog was “suppose to do”…

It is your right to be the next TMZ or ET, but not at my expense or at “H” expense and especially NOT at the Stern family expense.

And while you are doing some article reading, read what Bonnie has to say on the blog and especially about ppl like you who are trying to turn this into some way to sell your story..”

“R” invented the “sell your story” angle from another blogger who had suggested a letter writing campaign and that is all it was.

So I wanted to see what Bonnie had posted on “R”s blog about “ppl like” me. I surfed to the new blog and found a thank you note from the Stern family on “R’s” brand new two day old blog.

Here it is in its entirety as it was a posting on a public blog. See screen shot here

 

A special thank you from the Stern family

Posted in Uncategorized | | April 24th, 2007
Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:53 AM

To Havana, all of her volunteer helpers, and Rose and her husband,

I want to tell you how much I appreciate all of the help and valuable information you have provided for my brother, Howard. Contrary to what you may hear my parents are the people paying for all of Howard’s legal bills so the information you are providing is invaluable. I would like you to be assured that your information will never be divulged by me or my family in any way. It has been such a pleasure having all of your help since this tragedy started. My whole family has been greatly affected by the witch hunt my brother is going through. Unfortunately, with the O’Quinn machine, it’s taken a huge toll on everyone involved, including all of you. I am so sorry that so much greed has turned into all of this. All of you have been so amazing! I’m proud that Howard has people like you to support him. Thank you always for all that you do. It does make a difference!

Thanks,

Bonnie Stern

foot note: If you do not have Bonnie’s email addy, email Havana and she will get that to you. Bonnie is a very warm and gracious person, as is her entire family.

I then received the following email from Bonnie Stern….Subject: Howard

Hello Everyone,

I got a call from Howard and he is concerned about all the negativity that is going on and the emails back and forth. Something that started as very positive and a huge help has now become a lot of stress and unhappiness for many. This is very sad. He appreciates ALL the work that EVERYONE has done on his behalf. He is extremely grateful and is disappointed to see that it has become something people are upset and fighting over.

If the work that any of you do independently is sold to the media, that is fine with him as long as whatever is put out there is accurate and there is no reference or affiliation to the information coming from him (which he wouldn’t be).

Please try to understand that what he has gone through and is still going through is very stressful and this bantering back and forth is only making matters worse for everyone including each of you.

Thanks for all of your help and Howard hopes that all of this can be resolved and each of you may not have any further stress or anger regarding this

Thanks, Bonnie.

So, now I saw where the Stern family stood in all of this. Especially after, on the same day, I had received the email from Bonnie Stern from Howard.

The one email that I had sent to Bonnie Stern in my defense was a synopsis of what I have written in this series of articles. As you can see, the email that I eventually received from “Howard” addressed none of it. The letter is cordial but actions speak louder than words and the post on “R’s” new site screamed the new agenda. And I was correct. Although I know that the other blogger and “VM” received one, I don’t know who else did.

The post on “R’s” site from Bonnie Stern hurt and shocked a lot of the members of the site. They could not understand a thank you note posted on a site that they had no part of. Neither could I. I started this whole thing and I had suddenly become persona non grata.

But they persevered and rationalized that the letter was for them too. Well, some of them did. Some disappeared never to be heard from again and about three of them showed up on “R’s” site immediately. And that was ok with me. What was not ok was the bashing that was to begin on “R’s” public blog.

I had appointed not one but four new moderators for the chat room because it was a full time job keeping an eye on it. I decided to run the blog part alone save for rare times that I had to be away. One of which was to happen about a week later when my mother unexpectedly passed away.

To be continued…..

Sphere: Related Content

{ 149 comments }

101 pza January 19, 2008 at 10:22 PM

Alamo Girl – I agree with you. The TRUTH does set free, but only those who embrace it!

102 Matilda January 19, 2008 at 10:23 PM

“Why hasn’t Howard PAID all these people? Isn’t the Executor suppose to pay all the deceased bills?????????????????????”

~~~~~~~~~~

Why, as Anna’s business manager, did he not pay these bills when they were supposed to be paid while Anna was still alive? Anna and Howard seemed to have a huge sense of entitlement. They were (are) con-artists. From ignoring their bills to stealing a million dollar home from a friend – nothing was too low if it put a dollar in their pockets.

Howard’s continuing the practice now with his many lawsuits. The man will do anything to live on other people’s money and avoid getting a real job.

Can you say ‘lowlife’ boys and girls?

103 Another reader January 19, 2008 at 11:01 PM

I think alot of those claimants are the attornies that worked for Anna before she died and possibly some are attornies that are claiming a percentage of any Marshall money.

Some of the others, I believe are the 11 girls that decided not to settle with Trimspa.

The estate is still in probate. I guess they’ll get some money if there ever is any Marshall money. They won’t get it from profits from HSL selling Anna’s name/image because that belongs to HKS! nice, huh?

104 winnie January 19, 2008 at 11:16 PM

Anna never paid her bills, even before Howard, He had no control over her money, She spent her money the way she wanted, and she spent it untill it was gone, and she still had her bills to pay. Anna RULED

105 pza January 19, 2008 at 11:23 PM

Anna didn’t even know how much money she had as she seemed to defer to Howard for all matters related to money.
Sad that she misplaced her trust to someone who likely stole and skimmed from her for years! :(
IMO

106 winnie January 19, 2008 at 11:24 PM

The Estates lawyer said, on the hearing Jan.7th, that he was expecting some type of response sent to him,

Description: The attorney for the Petitioner (the Estate’s attorney) noted on the Jan. 7 hearing that he was expecting some type of ressponse from either Mark hatten, or Vergie”s lawyer. because tget wanted to be notified of what ever transpired, So he reset the hearing for FEB, 5th, THis hearing was to declare Dannielynn as sole heir to her mothers estate. HEREEEEEER come Vergie

107 Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies January 19, 2008 at 11:32 PM

Another reader: Some of the others, I believe are the 11 girls that decided not to settle with Trimspa.

Do tell. The Trimspa woman never received a judgement against Anna Nicole, where on earth do you get the idea that they could make a claim against her estate?

The only attorney that’s made a claim against Anna’s estate for the Marshall money is Howard. The actual “Marshall” attorneys are claiming only the fees Anna owed them at the time of her death.

Howard does NOT own the rights to Anna’s image.

Is that the Temptations I hear singing in the background?

But it was just my imagination — once again — running away with me. I tell you it was just my imagination running away with me

108 Matilda January 19, 2008 at 11:36 PM

winnie Says:
January 19th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

The Estates lawyer said, on the hearing Jan.7th, that he was expecting some type of response sent to him,

Description: The attorney for the Petitioner (the Estate’s attorney) noted on the Jan. 7 hearing that he was expecting some type of ressponse from either Mark hatten, or Vergie”s lawyer. because tget wanted to be notified of what ever transpired, So he reset the hearing for FEB, 5th, THis hearing was to declare Dannielynn as sole heir to her mothers estate. HEREEEEEER come Vergie

~~~~~~~~~~~

Totally untrue. The judge never mentioned Virgie or Mark Hatten. He said he was waiting for an anticipated response. That very well could have been more papers that he had requested from Howard.

Why must you lie?

109 Anonymous January 20, 2008 at 5:30 PM

Judge Seidlin’s ruling where he states Virgie is “less than credible”.
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/02/22/finalorder07824.pdf

“In addition, the Court finds that Arthur’s testimony to the effect that she had not received and had no anticipation of receiving remuneration arising from the death of Anna Nicole Smith or her subsequent burial to be less than credible” page 7

110 Anonymous January 20, 2008 at 11:49 PM

Vivian

I do appreciate your opinion, you one of the VERY few honest and objective ones on this site.
God bless

111 Anonymous January 20, 2008 at 11:51 PM

OQuin and Virgie firmly believe in the Marshall money!!

112 Anonymous January 21, 2008 at 1:07 AM

there will be none and virgie and OQuinn aren’t after the money they are after justice for Anna and Daniel

113 Anonymous January 21, 2008 at 2:15 AM

If you really really believe that Virgie & O’Quinn are not after the money I have the Brooklyn Bridge to sell ya!!!!!!!

114 Anonymous January 21, 2008 at 3:09 AM

http://cbs4.com/topstories/Anna.Nicole.Smith.2.279845.html
During her testimony, Stern’s lawyer asked Arthur if she sold a video of Daniel Smith’s memorial in the Bahamas for $12,500.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,269821,00.html
VAN SUSTEREN: Now let’s talk about who got what money. Did you get any money from any news organization or media outlet since Daniel died?
ARTHUR: OK. Splash magazine. And all they do is sell pictures.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
ARTHUR: You know. And this was way before Daniel died that they came to me and asked me, did I want to, you know, sell them some pictures, you know, of Daniel and Vickie and the family, and did I want to do a book? You know, and I thought well, you know, I might think about it. And that’s all I told them, I might think about it. So I did give them some pictures.
VAN SUSTEREN: How much did you get?
ARTHUR: Huh?
VAN SUSTEREN: How much did you get?
ARTHUR: Oh, how much money?
VAN SUSTEREN: Yes.
ARTHUR: Five thousand dollars.
VAN SUSTEREN: How many pictures?
ARTHUR: Oh, I don’t know, bunch, a bunch, you know, 50, 100, a bunch of pictures.

Then, Virgie took Splash with her to the medical examiner’s office to the viewing.

115 Lucy January 21, 2008 at 11:23 PM

Actually I believe there were only three or four people who went ‘to the viewing” and none was a reporter or photographer, except for Larry and I doubt that he took pictures. Your statement sounds good and of course is very damning to Virgie, which I’m sure was your intention, but is totally inaccurate.

116 Mish January 21, 2008 at 11:53 PM

Actually If you look back when Milstein was questioning Virgie when they came back from the Morgue, he asked her who the person was that accompiened her and she said it was ______(cant remember the name).
MIlstein “Who is he”?
Virgie “A freind of the family”
Milstein “who does he work for?”
Virgie “SPLASH”

Now Im paraphrasing(sp) but Im sure someone could dig up those court transcripts.

117 Mish January 21, 2008 at 11:56 PM

Anonymous Says:
January 21st, 2008 at 1:07 am
there will be none and virgie and OQuinn aren’t after the money they are after justice for Anna and Daniel

My only issue with that statement is …..
Then why dont they concentrate on that alone and leave Larry to raise his daughter?
If Howard is guilty and they can prove that, they dont have to worry about his “influence” on Larry.

118 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 12:12 AM

Mish, Mish, Mish…..

Why must you make up stories?

Virgie is doing absolutely nothing to prevent Larry from raising DL. She did not take anyone from Splash with her in to see Anna’s body. She has done absolutely nothing that would get her hands on the Marshall money.

Just because you can dream up these lies and spread them around the internet does not make them fact. You have obviously tipped back a few too many cups of the Sternie Kool-aid.

119 Mish January 22, 2008 at 12:52 AM

Matilda dear I will find the court transcript and let you apoligize later hun.

120 Mish January 22, 2008 at 12:53 AM

Then you can choke on your own “kool aid”

121 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 12:59 AM

Mish Says:
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 am

Matilda dear I will find the court transcript and let you apoligize later hun.

~~~~~~~~~

You do that, Snookums. Show me in the transcript that Virgie took someone from Splash in with her to view Anna’s body and I will most certainly “apoligize”.

122 wonderin January 22, 2008 at 1:42 AM

sh did not dream up those lies. It came up in court, and the judge was bot happy, her “friend also alerted the splash team that was there., and they started flying over the srea where Anna’s body was being viewed, in their helicopter. you ppl do not have the facts. Get your facts

123 wonderin January 22, 2008 at 1:42 AM

sorry , they were not lies.

124 Mish January 22, 2008 at 2:33 AM

Anna Nicole Smith’s mom was on the hot seat yesterday after she was allowed to visit her daughter’s body at the morgue and brought a gossip Web site reporter along for the ride.
Virgie Arthur squirmed on the witness stand in Broward County Court yesterday afternoon when it was disclosed that she was driven to the lunchtime morgue visit by a reporter for Splash News. Arthur described the reporter as a “close family friend,” but she stumbled when asked where the man lived.
Splash News is an entertainment Web site that pays money for photos, stories and tips about celebrities.
Arthur denied she has received any cash from Splash, but hedged when asked whether she has been promised any or has signed any contracts with the agency.

125 Mish January 22, 2008 at 2:34 AM

Im still lookin’

126 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 2:48 AM

See – she did NOT take the Splash photographer in with her to see the body.

Told ya.

127 Mish January 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM
128 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 3:22 AM

How many times to you intend to post articles and links proving yourself wrong, Mish?

129 Anonymous January 22, 2008 at 3:24 AM

Found this for you Mish! :)

The NY Post is reporting that the disturbing photos of deceased Anna that were run in the National Enquirer were real and not “photo re-creations” as the tabloid claimed. There was a story that Anna’s mother Virgie Arthur went to the morgue to visit Anna and brought a reporter for paparazzi photo agency Splash News with her, so this is entirely plausible.

http://www.celebitchy.com/category/anna_nicole_smith/

130 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 4:03 AM

LOL…oh my. Talk about the blind leading the blind.

From the link Mish provided:

“In attendance, Perper said, were Arthur and her husband and Howard K. Stern, Smith’s attorney and companion.”

I suppose it’s possible that Perper lied. LOLOLOLOL

Give it up already. You’re wrong.

131 Mish January 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM

““In attendance, Perper said, were Arthur and her husband and Howard K. Stern, Smith’s attorney and companion.”

Yes I notice too that there is no mention of Larry……….so amybe the third person with Virgie wasnt mentioned either.

132 Mish January 22, 2008 at 3:42 PM

Thanks Anonymous

133 Mish January 22, 2008 at 4:22 PM

OoooooH Matilda!!!!

Just when I was going to give up, I was going to make an apology to you and VA.

I was going to apoligize even though I knew I remembered her,Larry and Howard being questioned after the viewing by Milstein.
Milstein asked Virgie who she brought with her. Virgie said it was a close family friend, she said she could not remember where in FL he lived, asked what he did she said he worked for Splash.
I remember thinking to myself at the time WHY would she take a Splash reporter and not one of Anna’s siblings or her Aunt?

So I guess Ill wait for your apology now Hun….

134 Mish January 22, 2008 at 4:25 PM

Oooops proof I have to give it to you first…….LOL.

Paragraph 29
Arthur also acknowledged that a Splash representative accompanied her to a viewing of Smith’s body Wednesday afternoon.

http://cbs4.com/national/Anna.Nicole.Smith.2.401557.html

Later in the day, Arthur acknowledged that she had received some compensation from news organizations. She said the tabloid news agency Splash paid to fly her to the Bahamas when she visited her grandson’s grave last month, and she acknowledged her sister-in-law had sold family video footage

Anonymous thanks for that link it was some intresting reading. Very sick indeed whoeevr allowed those pics to be taken.

and……….my friend AP thanks for sending me in the right direction to get what I needed. :)

135 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 5:59 PM

Again, Mish, the Splash representative did accompany Virgie into the morgue and did NOT view Anna’s body. Not one thing that you’ve posted says otherwise.

Carry on with your lying – it only makes you look foolish.

136 A.P. January 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/21/smith.hearing/index.html
Viewing of Smith’s body
Earlier Wednesday, an attorney representing 5-month-old Dannielynn alleged that someone, possibly for money, had tipped off the media to an afternoon viewing of Smith’s body.
Leaking that information violated a confidentiality agreement.

137 Mish January 22, 2008 at 9:00 PM

OK Matilda
Im not going to play your games.
You stated that Virgie didnt take anyone from Splash with her to view the body.
I proved to you that she did, and now you want to put the spin on it that “the Splash representative did accompany Virgie into the morgue” BUT “did NOT view Anna’s body”.
The point is she did take someone from Splash to the Morgue.
So dear you keep drinking whatever poison you want to swallow. Fact is fact :)

138 truthbeknown January 22, 2008 at 9:21 PM
139 Matilda January 22, 2008 at 9:28 PM

You are lying again, Mish. I never denied that Virgie got a ride to the morgue with the person from Splash. Not once. All along I have said that Virgie did not take anyone from Splash IN with her to see the body. If anyone is playing games, it’s you. Either that, or you have reading comprehension problems.

See, that’s what Sternies do, they twist facts and make up lies, like the one about the Splash reporter taking pictures of Anna’s body. And then they spread those lies to other Sternies who eat them up like candy. And then they all jump up and hug each other with glee while they attack Virgie with the lies they’ve spread. It’s actually quite interesting to watch and would be funny if an innocent woman wasn’t being unfairly vilified.

Really, what difference does it make who Virgie rode with? Not one single bit.

140 RoseSpanks January 23, 2008 at 5:55 AM

Matilda Says:

Really, what difference does it make who Virgie rode with? Not one single bit.

=============================

I’m more concerned about Larry riding with Milsteine.

141 Mish January 23, 2008 at 2:10 PM

“Arthur also acknowledged that a Splash representative accompanied her to a viewing of Smith’s body”

It does not say ” Arthur also acknowledged that a Splash representative accompanied her to the Morgue”

“The NY Post is reporting that the disturbing photos of deceased Anna that were run in the National Enquirer were real and not “photo re-creations” as the tabloid claimed. There was a story that Anna’s mother Virgie Arthur went to the morgue to visit Anna and brought a reporter for paparazzi photo agency Splash News with her, so this is entirely plausible.”

Not a “sternie” story, “The NY Post is reporting”.

I guess its not really the ” whats difference” who Virgie rode with but why did she feel she had to take along a tabloid reporter instead of one of Anna’s siblings OR for that matter no one but her husband.
Why did she hedge on the stand when being asked who he was if there was no difference?
JMO

Now that being said Im done with you, playing your little twisted spin games. Wanna change words find someone else to playwith.

142 Matilda January 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM

I never changed a word, the problem appears to be in your reading comprehension.

The NY Post is considered to be a tabloid, lower than the National Enquirer – I guess you didn’t know that.

Anyway, bye!

143 Mish January 23, 2008 at 5:51 PM

If you were any more stupid, you’d have to be watered twice a week.
You’re depriving a village somewhere of an idiot.

144 Mish January 23, 2008 at 5:51 PM

Yea BYE!

145 poppini January 23, 2008 at 7:37 PM

lopl lol lollollollol l0l lol sorry cant stop laughin mish

146 poppini January 23, 2008 at 7:41 PM

Really, what difference does it make who Virgie rode with? Not one single bit.
DENSE DENSE, who else would she be riding with, but a family friend from SPLASH

147 truthbetold January 23, 2008 at 7:43 PM

hey matilda, It was’;nt because Vergie did’nt try, Like she took Rita to the funeral, [$$$$$$$] clse friend i suppose TOO???

148 freida January 24, 2008 at 12:25 AM

Hey, I’m sure Rita has a heart, too.
I really ‘once upon a time’ had a great amount of respect for her.
Loved her voice, too.
Actually she was one of my favorite reporters.

Not sure of her ‘credentials,’ though?

Wonder if she’s really blonde?

Doesn’t matter.

Seems she was/is really ambitious, and I respect that.

Virgie needed a friend, I think.

Someone to ‘tell her side of the story.

This is dimensional.

Many story’s will be told, and some will be true.

Family and DNA, has nothin’ to do with it.

Anna’s funeral was a publicized event…Daniel’s was private.

149 freida January 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM

Dear QV,
I see your title here…”The Truth and Nothin’ But.”
Yet it seems about ‘Everything Else But.’
The fatherless child.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

MySpace Tracker http://legalbudsz.com/sitemap_index.xml