Anna Nicole Signature Collage by Bamacat

All I can say is I hope the Federal goverment is doing their job. I seen the Wall of shame posted with the IPs and names with it. You can go on a IP web site and look up where the Ip is from and it is within 5 miles it says on the site. Most of the IPs are anyway. then all you need is a name which they have supplied. I think those people have dug a little to deep to be starting trouble now. Thanks QV for making all of the articles available and all of the work you have done is greatly appriciated. Thank you McCabe and O’Quinn for doing such great work as lawyers. Thank you Bahacat for all your artwork and you information you have supplied in this article.

Oh Hi Mr. Wood too.

I seen this on topix and it says it is okay to copy and paste. rose said she is going to get the ones that have copied and pasted on her site because of copyright laws.

Questions About Copyright I found something interesting on someone else’s blog. May I quote it?
Yes. Short quotations will usually be fair use, not copyright infringement. The Copyright Act says that “fair use…for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” So if you are commenting on or criticizing an item someone else has posted, you have a fair use right to quote. The law favors “transformative” uses — commentary, either praise or criticism, is better than straight copying — but courts have said that even putting a piece of an existing work into a new context (such as a thumbnail in an image search engine) counts as “transformative.” The blog’s author might also have granted you even more generous rights through a Creative Commons license, so you should check for that as well.
What is fair use?
There are no hard and fast rules for fair use (and anyone who tells you that a set number of words or percentage of a work is “fair” is talking about guidelines, not the law). The Copyright Act sets out four factors for courts to look at (17 U.S.C. § 107):
The purpose and character of the use. Transformative uses are favored over mere copying. Non-commercial uses are also more likely fair.
The nature of the copyrighted work. Is the original factual in nature or fiction? Published or unpublished? Creative and unpublished works get more protection under copyright, while using factual material is more often fair use.
The amount and substantiality of the portion used. Copying nearly all of a work, or copying its “heart” is less likely to be fair.
The effect on the market or potential market. This factor is often held to be the most important in the analysis, and it applies even if the original is given away for free. If you use the copied work in a way that substitutes for the original in the market, it’s unlikely to be a fair use; uses that serve a different audience or purpose are more likely fair. Linking to the original may also help to diminish the substitution effect. Note that criticism or parody that has the side effect of reducing a market may be fair because of its transformative character. In other words, if your criticism of a product is so powerful that people stop buying the product, that doesn’t count as having an “effect on the market for the work” under copyright law.