Categories
QV's Chatbox
7294 spams blocked
Last Message
7 hours, 19 minutes
ago
2 guests are online. Bing is crawling the site.
- Info : Please, resolve the addition below before post any new comment...
- Guest_4135 : wow those rose/art emails really tell the story. they even had drivers license numbers - that is probably not kosher
- Guest_1483 : They are clueless. They have been trying claim that all along, no matter how much you tell them there would be no Marshall money. Also pointing out the only one who placed a claim on the Marshall money was HKS in the probate of ANS's estate. JMO
- Guest_4840 : It really is sickening how the other side keeps saying that O'Quinn wanted the Marshall money. He died a billionaire and his whole fortune went to charity. Such a joke those people are.
- Guest_1483 : I agree that I don't think the appeals will be successful. Read the quotes of Justice Ginsburg from the Supreme Court hearing, she seems to be saying exactly what the 9th circuit court has now ruled. JMO «link»
- Guest_2791 : You are correct regarding no 6% PO. My guess is it is over for this matter. No to the appeals.
- Guest_2920 : There is no 6% for Stern unless they win the marshall case. that agreement says they get paid if they win or if she fired them then they get pd time & expenses I think Anna was indentured to Stern because she could not pay them off to get rid of them IMO
- Guest_2920 : I believe the appeal will be futile and that the supreme court will refuse to hear the case and it will be over quicker than we think.
- Guest_2410 : Be interesting if there is any pay outs to Stern/Rale. If it is proven to be their intentions to profits due to illegal/wrongful financial gains then the courts may rule against the estate being paid the 6% service fees for representation. Continuing with the litagious acts may be counter productive. Any comments on this?
- Guest_2925 : Media should learn to not pull this crap on pending legal matters. We saw too much of this w/ ANS cases...
- Guest_2925 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Do you have any of the exhibits for the last filing? TIA If you don't I understand. JMO
- Guest_1483 : 1868 Thankyou very much.
- Guest_1868 : Try this one. «link»
- Guest_1483 : Two of the pages can't be read at all.
- Guest_1483 : QV, if you get the document from yesterday, please post it. The one that is available right now has some pages messed up. Also it has none of the exhibits. Thanks again. JMO
- Guest_1483 : It would be good if it is her remains, especially for her family. Odds are against it though it seems. We will have to wait and see. JMO
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_4136 : I hope that poor family gets some closure.
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Natalie Holloway's body may have been discovered! Don't know yet if it is or isn't, could be a hoax. JMO
- Guest_4417 : interesting: Vickie’s counterclaim was not related to the bankruptcy, because she had already been discharged and her creditors would get none of the money she sought from Pierce in her counterclaim; (3rd guy)
- Guest_1483 : I doubt it. She will still be the Daughter of ANS. Eventually though interest in her will wane. I don't know what some will do for money then. JMO
- Guest_3736 : maybe they will stop taking pics of DL now that she is not an heiress and she will lead a more normal life out of the public eye
- Guest_1483 :
- Guest_2588 : Rose doesn't let little details bother her Guest 1483...it was a lot to read LOL
- Guest_1483 : With no dissenting opinion, only a concurring it would be 3-0 decision as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : I wonder where 'Rose' is getting the idea it was a 2-1 decision. There wasn't any dissenting opinion that I saw. There was the majority opinion which would be the two and then a concurring opinion that went further it appeared. So that makes it appear all 3 agreed with the main majority opinion as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : Yeah, the last thing I know about and is on the site is the notice of the change of date for Harris' hearing.
- Guest_1483 : Okay.
- QV : All I know is that the email is bouncing. No conversation about what is contained in the filing.
- Guest_1483 : He didn't tell you what the filing is? Or you learned it from someone else?
- QV : There is a filing made today in HC but anyone with Yahoo mail is not receiving it due to bounce backs. I don't know what the filing is though.
- Guest_1483 : QV when you talked to McCabe was there any updates on the other cases? TIA
- Guest_1483 : I agree with 1718 also.
- Guest_1483 : From what is being written here if accurate in regards to what 'swim's is saying, apparently he didn't understand the Supreme Court ruling and doesn't understand the current ruling, or didn't read it. The current ruling did mention the Supreme Court decision. LOL/JMO
- QV : I vote with you!
- Guest_1718 : prediction: no en banc rehearing and supremes won't take it
- QV : I think the estate is insolvent with more creditors than money.
- Guest_001 : You too QV
- QV : Ok 001. Talk to you then. Take care.
- Guest_3818 : there were a lot of attornies working on that case a long with Richard Kent. I think one of them was a British attorney also that wrote a filing to the Supreme Court
- Guest_3818 : probably...isn't is a lot of Anna's attornies that will still it to get what they claimed in her Estate as a credit claim?
- Guest_001 : I will write you up an email to catch you up. It has been a heck of a winter and I am so looking forward to spring
- QV : Glad to hear that. Yes, its been a long time but some of us are still hanging in there.
- Guest_001 : Good! it's been a while I know..lol
- QV : In the 9th circuit.
- QV : That's what I'm thinking too. They had their run at that court but McCabe said they can ask for a re-hearing.
- Guest_218 : the supremes will refuse to take it
- QV : Hi Girl! How are you doing?
- Guest_001 : Hi QV! I just saw the news and had to drop in to see it here
- QV : Does anyone think that HKS attorneys will spend any more money on this case?
- QV : For Swims:
- Guest_1356 : The tortured arguments used to declare that the ANS – Pierce Marshall claim/counter-cl aim was not a core proceeding (easy way out for the 9th) fail to justify how the 9th feels the will of Congress (clearly written) can be intellectually ignored as if unconstitutional . Another issue for SCOTUS
- QV : Oh does he think HKS case is important enough to change the rule of the United States Supreme Court? Once again, ROFLMAO!
- Guest_1356 : 184. No wonder the 9th is the most reversed U.S. Appeals Court in America • Two months shy of three years after SCOTUS spoke for that thin opinion to arrive. • Old arguments and case law rehashed but not a word about the ANS SCOTUS details
- Guest_1356 : Swims is pissed at the Ninth Circuit. He used to say they would "get it right". Now he says that SCOTUS will have to amend and rule on things that the Ninth keeps making mistakes on.
- QV : Another update is on the article with some info about appeal procedures.
- QV : Hahaa..Lol!
- Guest_4942 : very funny that "swims" is having a breakdown LOL
Captcha:
Name: URL/Email: Message:
Pages
Blogroll