Fanciulla, who is one of my favorite debaters on the Topix thread, “Who Thinks Anna and Daniel Were Killed”, found an email previously published on the site jonbenetindexguide.com.
The recipient of a letter from Atlanta, GA attorney – L. Lin Wood gives permission on the page above to republish the email if its done in its entirety. Although I am publishing the email here, please go to the page above and read her excellent arguments concerning Wood’s comments.
Thanks again to Fanci for the find and to Carole for the suggestion to post this.
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:09:55 EDT
From: LLWood47@xxx.xxx
To: t*******.com
Subject: Re: Crime Magazine
4-15-03
Dear Tricia:
Mr. Ross’ article is based on outdated information, false statements and misrepresentations of fact. Like you, Mr. Ross knows very little of the actual evidence in the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation. I never cease to be amazed at the bias of people like you against the Ramsey family. You do not know them and the tragedy suffered by their family is really none of your business. Yet, you and others elevate yourselves to the role of judge and jury even though you do not know the evidence. And you apparently take pride in circumventing the justice system to accuse people of murder and other illegal acts.
Mary Keenan knows all the evidence. You can continue to fool yourself by trying to “spin” or otherwise explain her statement to your advantage, but you will fail. The weight of all of the evidence points to an intruder. And it is more evidence than Judge Carnes’ was able to see and it is more evidence than Lou Smit has previously disclosed. I am comfortable with my representation of innocent people. And I am comfortable with the fact the person now in charge of the investigation is fair and objective and will follow the evidence.
Too bad for you that you are so uncomfortable with the fact that the evidence does not implicate the Ramsey family.
If you have any credible information about this case, please contact the District Attorney’s office. I prefer not to receive any more e-mails from people who apparently have so much free time on their hands that they become obsessed playing amateur detective. Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied.
L. Lin Wood
L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
Suite 2140
The Equitable Building
100 Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Phone: 404.522.1713
Fax: 404.522.1716
E-mail: llwood@linwoodlaw.com
Internet: http://www.linwoodlaw.com/
Mr Wood wrote this email over five (5) years ago. I wonder if he has learned anything about the power of the internet by now. I see he has written about this subject but I have not had the opportunity to read his work.
Wood apparently must have gained some type of respect for crime buff bloggers. It was his office via attorney Ben Erwin who endorsed the receipt of and collected internet research leading to the appointment of Rose Turner by herself and Bonnie Stern to the position of “legal liaison for Howard K. Stern“.
Does the legal liaison position include asking people to comitt dubious acts such as “pretexting”? One such request from Rose via email would have involved calling Virgie Arthurs family in an attempt to obtain personal family information. Details are in the legal filings for the blogger case.
I am not saying that Wood or Erwin had any involvment with that scam. However I would caution them to “know thy conspirators”, before enlisting their help.
While I’m at it, I would like to acknowledge all the abusive comments and accusations of criminal behavior from Rose and her members concerning some PUBLIC AND UNPROTECTED documents in Arthur vs Stern et al and the Bloggers, that I posted for all to read the other day. I see the comments. They are on the internet with my real name finding their way into search engines. They come to my email box too. It would be one thing if the accusations are true. But they are not. I’ll leave it at that for now. But I don’t think those type of comments are going to win the defendants any sympathy from the judge or a jury.
it to get what they claimed in her Estate as a credit claim?
{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }
What part of what we are reading is not true?
Thank you for putting this out here! The arrogant snobbery of Woodie is so apparant. And how funny that something that happened 5 years ago sounds almost like something that has just occured.
HKS vs OQuinn was “settled amicably” and that is all either side is entitled to say due to the terms of that settlement. Excuse me, but why would someone NOT want the terms of a settlement in a defamation case to be known? That is utter BULL-loney. Sterns settlement did nothing to restore his (cough, cough) damaged reputation, and I doubt very seriously that it put much, if any, money in his pocket. But appearances, to Wood, are everything…He won’t take a case to court he’s not sure he’ll win, and when forced to litigate in court, he doesn’t do very well for his clients. But, by damn, he will put his arrogant nose in the air and call individuals who are passionate about a miscarriage of justice “obsessive”
http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/04162003FFJ-Wood-DisturbedIndividuals.htm
For those who have read the entire post, the above link should take you there.
Woodie thinks internet slueths are about three bricks shy of a load. I think what upsets him is that we internet slueths will neither drink HIS koolaid nor step in hin BULL-loney. It’s amazing that “internet sleuths” are at the very heart of one of the Texas suits. LOL.
:wink:
Congratulations, QV. It looks like you found your 3 missing bricks!
Thanks Carole! Yes, thats very interesting how things can change in five years. Woody goes from condemning internet sleuths to having a hand in recruiting them.
Lucky, why don’t you just come right out and say what you mean. I “believe” the letter to be true or the woman would not have put it on the internet. I know the rest of what I wrote is true as well.
Do you honestly believe everything you read on the Internet? Sorry, but I don’t. There is no way to tell if her story is factual or all BS, like so much on the Internet is. I just dont eat and gobble up the food, because it was free.
Gosh, I need to go back and read all of this.
Meanwhile I’ve gotta’ agree with Mr. Wood.
By the way, please pity me first!!!!
Sri…still think HK$ should be charged with negligence…after all he bought & brought ANS her drugs!!!!
Yes, i agree with Mr.Wood. There are many mentally ill, obsessed bloggers, stalkers, who harass innocent people. They are frustrated with their lives and project frustration and unhappiness toward their victims.H.K Stern is very explicit example of such outrageous behavior.Some mentally and physically ill women had harassed Howard and his family for two years.Thank God Howard has loving family and friends who supported him from day one.
Well, well, seems Woody has changed his mind about the internet. He has a hard on for chasing after Wilma and all her “Nic”s and various post on the internet. Why would he be interested if he places such little significance on what is said on the w.w.w. ?
QV, can you tell me where to find the documents that you say Harris County published whole email addresses? I want to see a copy of them and have never ordered docs, so I dont know how to.
Also, can you explain why I am even on those docs?
Lucky, here is the link where you can get the documents.
https://e-docs.hcdistrictclerk.com/eDocs.Web/Login.aspx
I have no idea why they have any of those people’s names or emails on those docs. What I get out of it is, they are asking Stern for any communications that he has had with those email addys.
Lucky, I don’t know if those particular documents are listed yet, you may have to call the clerk.
Thanks
Oh my, I am not a member and don’t know the info they are asking for to get those. I don’t seem to have that info they need. Any chance you would email them? If not, maybe someone else can. I want to see where Harris County posted my full email address and where they got it from. Is so, thanks, if not, no worries.
If they were sealed how did just anyone get them? Odd
Lucky, they are not sealed. That is the point and why I said that Rose is not telling the truth. Those particular documents were not filed under seal nor were they protected. They are “public documents”. You can call and request copies.
Are you saying that Rose lied when she said they were to be sealed for privacy by the judge, and that her lawyer did not do the proper job to have them sealed?
Lucky, asked and answered. Call Harris County to get the facts.
“Personally, I think people who immerse themselves in this case on the Internet are disturbed individuals who must not have much of a life and are to be pitied.”
Gotta love Lin Wood…lol Obviously he will say anything to make his client look good, whomever he or she may be.
But let’s follow Wood’s “MO”. First, he threaten anyone and everyone that, should they “defame” his client, they will be dealing with him in Court. *snickers* like THAT would ever happen. So let’s review his statement in that context.
If a “pitiful” blogger opined that his Client was less that stellar, he would sue said blogger? Even if, in his opinion, said blogger was “disturbed”? If said blogger was “disturbed” then it stands to reason that said blogger is not rational and thereby not responsible for the content of their “disturbed” blog, now are they?
On the other hand *snickers again* we have new “disturbed” bloggers who are obsessed with finding the dirt on anyone who is against he client, and on THIS, he accepts the help of “disturbed” bloggers.
Come on. Admit it. You find the irony rather amusing, don’t you?
If it were possible, I’d say sic the “Fruitcake Lady” on him. That would have been highy amusing to see those two go at it.
What a handsome critter…
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/clickToGive/home.faces?siteId=3
Dogs always know the truth.