web analytics

Don Clark-The OQuinn Law Firm-And The Rumor Mill

by QV on 02/09/2010

in Uncategorized

Followers of the Anna Nicole Smith cases may have heard about Jury Consultant and Investigative Strategist, Don Clark leaving the O’Quinn law firm. Although Mr. Clark is no longer operating in his former capacity, he was asked by executor of the John O’Quinn estate, Gerald Treece to work for the estate on certain confidential matters instead of working for the firm.

It’s possible Mr. Clark may also be performing other duties for the firm including assisting Virgie Arthur’s attorney Neil McCabe on matters which can not be disclosed at this time.

As for Wilma Vice, she will continue in her prior support capacity assisting McCabe in all things “Anna Nicole” with her primary focus on the criminal case in California regarding Howard K. Stern, Dr. Eroshevich and Dr. Kapoor.

Wilma said, “my dedication will remain firm and strong for Virgie Arthur and family.”

Wilma revealed that she is also going to reserve more time in her life for family and personal issues and she is planning and anticipating some exciting events for 2010.

*** I need to make a correction. I would like it make it clear that Don Clark no longer works for “The O’Quinn Law Firm”. He may be engaged to do things on an as needed basis but he is no longer an employee of the firm. He works for Gerald Treece. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. Thanks. QV

Sphere: Related Content

{ 13 comments }

1 Lucky February 9, 2010 at 5:07 PM

May WV have a fantastic time with her new events of 2010………….

CONGRATULATIONS Wilma

2 QV February 9, 2010 at 5:33 PM

I’ll join you in that. Congratulations Wilma. Cheers Lucky! :drink:

3 Carole February 9, 2010 at 5:35 PM

ROTFLMAO….what a great picture!

4 QV February 9, 2010 at 5:56 PM

I wish I knew how to put some music on here. That picture makes me want to sing the theme song to Miami Vice..lol!!

5 freida1 February 9, 2010 at 6:54 PM

Great song, reminds me of fast cars and sunshine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu8vMGn1lW4

Feeling a little homesick, lol.

6 Mary February 9, 2010 at 7:04 PM

Did Bamacat do that for you? It’s adorable.

7 QV February 9, 2010 at 8:28 PM

No, I don’t think Cat did this one. Not sure who did it. But it is funny..lol!

8 QV February 9, 2010 at 8:34 PM

At this link http://www.tmz.com/tmzlive/
There is a video of Levin. He says he is going to have Dr. Kapoor on as a guest and Kapoor is going to tell something no one has heard before. Levin is also schtupping for HKS. He says he is going to give his take on the drug charge case.

Where this all takes place is on the above link. Look to your right and look for this..
and select…….
TMZ Live 02/09/10 Part 3
Possible plea deal in Dr. Conrad Murray case? The Jackson Family shows to the DA.
Howard K. Stern’s case. The Kardashians

Watch the video beginning at about the four minute mark and he will say Kapoor is going to be on and talk about Howard. Kapoor will be on at 1:30 PST.

9 trina February 9, 2010 at 10:08 PM

Well dang, I thought I read somewhere that McC said he was now employed by the estate. Or the Foundation? Same thing? Isn’t it? Isn’t everyone at the O’Q lawfirm now pretty much working for the estate? Headed by Treece? So why is DClark being singled out?

10 SheStone February 9, 2010 at 10:24 PM

trina, how silly. The estate owns the firm. People who work for the firm therefore do work for the estate, at least to some respect. People can however work for the estate without working for the firm, because the estate is more than just the firm. So Don Clark can work for the estate without working for the firm. McCabe who works for the firm, can be said to work for the estate because the estate owns the firm. That is how I understand it. I hope this helped you. JMO :rotfl:

11 SheStone February 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM

trina, to help you understand lets use this example. You have your local public school system. You have a person, we’ll call Person A, who works for the public school system as an administrator in the superintendents office. You also have a person we’ll call Person B, who works for one of the public highschools. Both persons could be said to work for the public school system. Person A though doesn’t work for the highschool, whereas Person B does. Hope that helped. JMO

12 Mary February 10, 2010 at 9:23 AM

Oh God SheStone, I can’t believe you had to explain that to her.

13 freida1 February 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM

…not real smart, but ‘in to it.’

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

MySpace Tracker http://legalbudsz.com/sitemap_index.xml