Arthur vs Stern et al Houston

by QV on 08/11/2008

Virgie’s Supplemental Record to Art Harris’ 1st Court of Appeals which was previously file with Art Harris’ Writ of Mandamus
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/1stCtFiling1023.pdf

Arthur’s Response to Art Harris’ Motion to Strike certain documents
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/ResptoAHMottoStrike.pdf

Arthur’s SurReply to Art Harris’ Reply to Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Writ of Mandamus
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/SurReplytoAH.pdf

Arthur’s response to Harris Motion to Strike
http://qvsplace.com/Arthur_vs_Stern_Response_to_Harris_Motion_to_Strike_102309.pdf

Letter – Additional materials for inclusion in the record
http://qvsplace.com/Arthur_vs_Stern_Supplemental_Record_102309.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Art_Harris_Writ_of_Mandamus_90409.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Art_Harris_requests_stay_90409.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_in_contempt_082409.pdf

Response_Stephens_Emergency_Motion_re_Compel_Motion_081409.pdf

Response_to_Stephens_Emergency_Motion_re_Capias_081409.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_Writ_of_Attachment_Signed_081109.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_Granted_Join_CBS_081109.pdf

Harris_Response_to_Motion_for_Leave_to_Join_CBS_080709.pdf

Revised_Order_WOA_Teresa_Stephens.pdf

Nelda_Settles_080609_woohoo.pdf

Virgie_Arthur_Motion_to_Dismiss_and_for_Sanctions_Stephens_080509.pdf

Arthur_Reply_to_Stern_About_Submission_of_Additional_Materials_080509.pdf

080309_Supplemental_Record_Bonnie_Stern.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Proposed_Order_Capias_Stephens_072209.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Proposed_Order_Denying_Stephens_Motions_072209.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Response_to_Teresa_Stephens_Motion_to_Cancel_072209.pdf

Writ of Mandamus Re Production of Documents Stay Granted

Writ of Mandamus Deadline for Response

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_emergency_relief_requested.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_for_Emergency_Hearing_on_Motion_to_Cancel-

Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_to_Cancel-Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Response_to_Harris_Motion_to_Clarify.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_to_compel_Nelda_Turner.pdf

Arthur_vs_Bonnie_Stern_CA_summons.pdf

Arthur_vs_Bonnie_Stern_debt_non_dischargable_CA.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_withdraw_sanction_request.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harris_concedes_jurisdiction.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harris_answer_Arthur_Second_Amended_Petition.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_withdraw_subpoenas.pdf

Motion to Recuse Denied

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Underwood_will_hear_recusal_motion.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Art_Harris_joins_Motion_to_recuse

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Houston_Motion_to_recuse.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harrington_motion_for_contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Plaintiff_response_Turner.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_quash_Turner_depo.pdf

Bonnie_Stern_bankruptcy_2.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Rose_Turner_Motion_Add_CBS.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_order_compelling_production_forensic_appointment .pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_to_Compel_Stephens.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_hearing_date.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_et_al_Ogden_withdraw_granted.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_et_al_amended_hearing_notice.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Second_Amended_Petition_Adding_Birkhead.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Motion_to_Compel_Bonnie_Stern.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Response_to_Compel.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_Response.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Affidavit.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Exhibit_A.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Exhibit_B.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Exhibit_C.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Exhibit_D.pdf

112008_Arthur_vs_Stern_1st_Amended_Petition.pdf

101508_Arthur_vs_Stern_Hearing_Set_Harris_BStern.pdf

092408_Arthur_vs_Stern_Docket_Control_Order.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_reconsider_transfer.pdf

091908_Arthur_vs_Stern_transfer_to_280th.pdf

081408_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_McCabe.pdf

081308_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_Yahoo.pdf

081108_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_SE.pdf

080808_Arthur_vs_Stern_Houston_Stephens.pdf

062508_Transcript_041808.pdf

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Meta
Archives
Spam Blocked

12,970 spam comments

blocked by
Akismet
Please Click Every Day To Feed A Hungry Stray Animal. Its Free!

Categories
QV's Chatbox
7267 spams blocked
Last Message
3 hours, 51 minutes
ago
3 guests are online.
- Info : Please, resolve the addition below before post any new comment...
- Guest_2925 : Media should learn to not pull this crap on pending legal matters. We saw too much of this w/ ANS cases...
- Guest_2925 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Do you have any of the exhibits for the last filing? TIA If you don't I understand. JMO
- Guest_1483 : 1868 Thankyou very much.
- Guest_1868 : Try this one. «link»
- Guest_1483 : Two of the pages can't be read at all.
- Guest_1483 : QV, if you get the document from yesterday, please post it. The one that is available right now has some pages messed up. Also it has none of the exhibits. Thanks again. JMO
- Guest_1483 : It would be good if it is her remains, especially for her family. Odds are against it though it seems. We will have to wait and see. JMO
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_4136 : I hope that poor family gets some closure.
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Natalie Holloway's body may have been discovered! Don't know yet if it is or isn't, could be a hoax. JMO
- Guest_4417 : interesting: Vickie’s counterclaim was not related to the bankruptcy, because she had already been discharged and her creditors would get none of the money she sought from Pierce in her counterclaim; (3rd guy)
- Guest_1483 : I doubt it. She will still be the Daughter of ANS. Eventually though interest in her will wane. I don't know what some will do for money then. JMO
- Guest_3736 : maybe they will stop taking pics of DL now that she is not an heiress and she will lead a more normal life out of the public eye
- Guest_1483 :
- Guest_2588 : Rose doesn't let little details bother her Guest 1483...it was a lot to read LOL
- Guest_1483 : With no dissenting opinion, only a concurring it would be 3-0 decision as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : I wonder where 'Rose' is getting the idea it was a 2-1 decision. There wasn't any dissenting opinion that I saw. There was the majority opinion which would be the two and then a concurring opinion that went further it appeared. So that makes it appear all 3 agreed with the main majority opinion as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : Yeah, the last thing I know about and is on the site is the notice of the change of date for Harris' hearing.
- Guest_1483 : Okay.
- QV : All I know is that the email is bouncing. No conversation about what is contained in the filing.
- Guest_1483 : He didn't tell you what the filing is? Or you learned it from someone else?
- QV : There is a filing made today in HC but anyone with Yahoo mail is not receiving it due to bounce backs. I don't know what the filing is though.
- Guest_1483 : QV when you talked to McCabe was there any updates on the other cases? TIA
- Guest_1483 : I agree with 1718 also.
- Guest_1483 : From what is being written here if accurate in regards to what 'swim's is saying, apparently he didn't understand the Supreme Court ruling and doesn't understand the current ruling, or didn't read it. The current ruling did mention the Supreme Court decision. LOL/JMO
- QV : I vote with you!
- Guest_1718 : prediction: no en banc rehearing and supremes won't take it
- QV : I think the estate is insolvent with more creditors than money.
- Guest_001 : You too QV
- QV : Ok 001. Talk to you then. Take care.
- Guest_3818 : there were a lot of attornies working on that case a long with Richard Kent. I think one of them was a British attorney also that wrote a filing to the Supreme Court
- Guest_3818 : probably...isn't is a lot of Anna's attornies that will still it to get what they claimed in her Estate as a credit claim?
- Guest_001 : I will write you up an email to catch you up. It has been a heck of a winter and I am so looking forward to spring
- QV : Glad to hear that. Yes, its been a long time but some of us are still hanging in there.
- Guest_001 : Good! it's been a while I know..lol
- QV : In the 9th circuit.
- QV : That's what I'm thinking too. They had their run at that court but McCabe said they can ask for a re-hearing.
- Guest_218 : the supremes will refuse to take it
- QV : Hi Girl! How are you doing?
- Guest_001 : Hi QV! I just saw the news and had to drop in to see it here
- QV : Does anyone think that HKS attorneys will spend any more money on this case?
- QV : For Swims:
- Guest_1356 : The tortured arguments used to declare that the ANS – Pierce Marshall claim/counter-cl aim was not a core proceeding (easy way out for the 9th) fail to justify how the 9th feels the will of Congress (clearly written) can be intellectually ignored as if unconstitutional . Another issue for SCOTUS
- QV : Oh does he think HKS case is important enough to change the rule of the United States Supreme Court? Once again, ROFLMAO!
- Guest_1356 : 184. No wonder the 9th is the most reversed U.S. Appeals Court in America • Two months shy of three years after SCOTUS spoke for that thin opinion to arrive. • Old arguments and case law rehashed but not a word about the ANS SCOTUS details
- Guest_1356 : Swims is pissed at the Ninth Circuit. He used to say they would "get it right". Now he says that SCOTUS will have to amend and rule on things that the Ninth keeps making mistakes on.
- QV : Another update is on the article with some info about appeal procedures.
- QV : Hahaa..Lol!
- Guest_4942 : very funny that "swims" is having a breakdown LOL
- QV : Swims said Pierce robbed his father while he was alive. His father intended for Pierce to inherit his estate so even if he did take anything, it was his to take.
- QV : ....and forum shopping.
- QV : Well, the 9th Circuit has spoken. Marshall gave all he was going to during his life. The court is not going to disavow the wishes of the deceased. The court agreed with the Marshall family. The probate court ruled correctly and anything after that is dust in the wind.....
- QV : Ok TY
- Guest_3371 : yeah, go read his post. he says they ignored Scotus telling the ninth coa that the probate and bankruptcy were seperate core proceedings and they should rule on the other one and not the probate one.
- QV : Who got it wrong? The 9th Circuit?
- Guest_3371 : Swims posted and said they got it wrong.
- Guest_1483 : Hopefully any appeal will be quickly turned down against HKS. JMO
Captcha:
Name: URL/Email: Message:
Pages
Blogroll

Arthur vs Stern et al Houston

Meta

Archives

Spam Blocked

Please Click Every Day To Feed A Hungry Stray Animal. Its Free!

Categories

QV's Chatbox

Pages

Blogroll