Arthur vs Stern-CBS

by QV on 08/06/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_Motion_Atty_fees_withdrawn_125.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_041309_122.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_Order_modify_protective_agreement_119.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_117.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_111_Case_Dismissed.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_109-2_Motion_to_Dismiss_proposed_order.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_109_Motion_to_Dismiss.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_108.pdf

121708_Arthur_vs_Stern_103_Tunstall.pdf

110408_Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_100.pdf

110508_Arthur_vs_Stern_CBS_98.pdf

Filed 05/21/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

052108_Arthur_reply_Sterns_motion_dismiss_jurisdiction.pdf

Exhibit A is; 051308_Von_Waddle_full_interview.pdf

052108_Exhibit_C_Waddle_email_excerpts.pdf

Filed 05/20/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

052008_Arthur_opposition_motion_to_transfer.pdf

052008_Arthur_Exhibit_A.pdf

Filed 05/19/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

051908_Turner_motion_to_transfer.pdf

Filed 05/14/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

051408_Arthur_reply_CBS_surreply.pdf

051408_Exhibit_A_Baker_sworn_stmt.pdf

051408_Exhibit_B_Waddle_email.pdf

Filed 05/13/2008

Virgie Arthur vs Nelda (Rose) Milligan Turner and Kenneth Turner

051308_Arthur_reply_Turner_response.pdf

051308_Von_Waddle_full_interview.pdf

051308_Chrystal_Baker_full_depo.pdf

Filed 05/08/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

050808_Supplement_plaintiffs_memo.pdf

050808_Chrystal_Baker_Affidavit.pdf

050808_Exhibit_Crystal_Baker.pdf

Filed 05/07/2008

Virgie Arthur vs Nelda and Ken Turner

*Please see the exhibits mentioned filed previously below.

050708_Turner_response_motion_compel.pdf

Filed 05/06/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

05062008_CBS_reply.pdf

Filed 04/25/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04252008_Arthur_memo_reply_defendants_response_n.pdf

04252008_Arthur_email_concerning_notice.pdf

04252008_Arthur_reply_to_CBS_response_add_defendants.pdf

Filed 04/24/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04242008_CBS_Response_Arthurs_Amended_Motion_Add_Defendants.pdf

04242008_CBS_Exhibit_1.pdf

04242008_CBS_Exhibit_2_n.pdf

Filed 04/17/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04172008_affidavit_Waddle.pdf

04172008_Supplemental_response_Turner_motion_to_quash_n.pdf

Filed 04/14/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04142008_Lyndal_amended_motion_to_quash_and_exhibits_n.pdf

04142008_Luke_Lantta_added_pro_hac_vice.pdf

04142008_Lyndal_subpoena_temp_withdrawn_n.pdf

Filed 04/10/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04102008_Response_Turner_motion_to_quash.pdf

04102008_ExhibitA.pdf

04102008_ExhibitB.pdf

04102008_ExhibitC.pdf

04102008_Proposed_Order.pdf

04102008_Reply_to_CBS_response_to_motion_add_additional_defendants.pdf

04102008_ExhibitA_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitB_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitC_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitD_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitE_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitF_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitG_response.pdf

04102008_ExhibitH_response.pdf

04102008_1st_amended_complaint_n.pdf

Filed 04/07/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

4072008_Lyndal_motion_to_quash_n.pdf

Filed 04/04/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

04042008_CBS_response_to_motion_add_additional_defendants.pdf

04042008_CBS_proposed_order.pdf

04042008_Sterns_response_supports_CBS.pdf

04042008_Sterns_proposed_order.pdf

Filed 03/27/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

Initial_Conference_April_25_2008.pdf

Arthur_motion_to_compel_production_docs_032708.pdf

Proposed_order_032708

R_K_Turner_motion_to_quash_03272008.pdf

Exhibit_A_Turner_03272008.pdf

Exhibit_B_Turner_03272008.pdf

Notice_of_service_of_subpoena_RTurner_exhibit_A.pdf

Notice_of_service_of_subpoena_KTurner_exhibit_B.pdf

Proposed_order_Turner_03272008.pdf

Filed 03/14/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

Joint Discovery Case Management Plan

Arthur_memo_amend_suit_additional_defendants_03142008.pdf

Arthur_Exhibit1_03142008.pdf

Arthur_Exhibit2_03142008.pdf

Arthur_Exhibit3_03142008.pdf

Filed 02/11/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

Objection-to-Lyndal-subpoena-no-discovery-yet.pdf

Object-Lyndal-subpoena-exhibitA.pdf

Rose-subpoena-withdrawn.pdf

KenT-subpoena-withdrawn.pdf

O’Quinn_reply_Stern_MOL_oppose_dismissal_jurisdiction.pdf

O’Quinn-reply-to-Stern-MOL-oppose-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

Filed 02/08/2008

Virgie Arthur v Howard K Stern, CBS Studios and KPRC Houston

There are also two exhibits which are the same subpoenas that we already have.

Motion to Quash/Protection Order for Rose and Ken Turner

Proposed Order to Quash

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Leave a Comment

Meta
Archives
Spam Blocked

12,988 spam comments

blocked by
Akismet
Please Click Every Day To Feed A Hungry Stray Animal. Its Free!

Categories
QV's Chatbox
7276 spams blocked
Last Message
17 hours, 9 minutes
ago
3 guests are online.
- Info : Please, resolve the addition below before post any new comment...
- Guest_2925 : Media should learn to not pull this crap on pending legal matters. We saw too much of this w/ ANS cases...
- Guest_2925 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Do you have any of the exhibits for the last filing? TIA If you don't I understand. JMO
- Guest_1483 : 1868 Thankyou very much.
- Guest_1868 : Try this one. «link»
- Guest_1483 : Two of the pages can't be read at all.
- Guest_1483 : QV, if you get the document from yesterday, please post it. The one that is available right now has some pages messed up. Also it has none of the exhibits. Thanks again. JMO
- Guest_1483 : It would be good if it is her remains, especially for her family. Odds are against it though it seems. We will have to wait and see. JMO
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_4136 : I hope that poor family gets some closure.
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Natalie Holloway's body may have been discovered! Don't know yet if it is or isn't, could be a hoax. JMO
- Guest_4417 : interesting: Vickie’s counterclaim was not related to the bankruptcy, because she had already been discharged and her creditors would get none of the money she sought from Pierce in her counterclaim; (3rd guy)
- Guest_1483 : I doubt it. She will still be the Daughter of ANS. Eventually though interest in her will wane. I don't know what some will do for money then. JMO
- Guest_3736 : maybe they will stop taking pics of DL now that she is not an heiress and she will lead a more normal life out of the public eye
- Guest_1483 :
- Guest_2588 : Rose doesn't let little details bother her Guest 1483...it was a lot to read LOL
- Guest_1483 : With no dissenting opinion, only a concurring it would be 3-0 decision as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : I wonder where 'Rose' is getting the idea it was a 2-1 decision. There wasn't any dissenting opinion that I saw. There was the majority opinion which would be the two and then a concurring opinion that went further it appeared. So that makes it appear all 3 agreed with the main majority opinion as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : Yeah, the last thing I know about and is on the site is the notice of the change of date for Harris' hearing.
- Guest_1483 : Okay.
- QV : All I know is that the email is bouncing. No conversation about what is contained in the filing.
- Guest_1483 : He didn't tell you what the filing is? Or you learned it from someone else?
- QV : There is a filing made today in HC but anyone with Yahoo mail is not receiving it due to bounce backs. I don't know what the filing is though.
- Guest_1483 : QV when you talked to McCabe was there any updates on the other cases? TIA
- Guest_1483 : I agree with 1718 also.
- Guest_1483 : From what is being written here if accurate in regards to what 'swim's is saying, apparently he didn't understand the Supreme Court ruling and doesn't understand the current ruling, or didn't read it. The current ruling did mention the Supreme Court decision. LOL/JMO
- QV : I vote with you!
- Guest_1718 : prediction: no en banc rehearing and supremes won't take it
- QV : I think the estate is insolvent with more creditors than money.
- Guest_001 : You too QV
- QV : Ok 001. Talk to you then. Take care.
- Guest_3818 : there were a lot of attornies working on that case a long with Richard Kent. I think one of them was a British attorney also that wrote a filing to the Supreme Court
- Guest_3818 : probably...isn't is a lot of Anna's attornies that will still it to get what they claimed in her Estate as a credit claim?
- Guest_001 : I will write you up an email to catch you up. It has been a heck of a winter and I am so looking forward to spring
- QV : Glad to hear that. Yes, its been a long time but some of us are still hanging in there.
- Guest_001 : Good! it's been a while I know..lol
- QV : In the 9th circuit.
- QV : That's what I'm thinking too. They had their run at that court but McCabe said they can ask for a re-hearing.
- Guest_218 : the supremes will refuse to take it
- QV : Hi Girl! How are you doing?
- Guest_001 : Hi QV! I just saw the news and had to drop in to see it here
- QV : Does anyone think that HKS attorneys will spend any more money on this case?
- QV : For Swims:
- Guest_1356 : The tortured arguments used to declare that the ANS – Pierce Marshall claim/counter-cl aim was not a core proceeding (easy way out for the 9th) fail to justify how the 9th feels the will of Congress (clearly written) can be intellectually ignored as if unconstitutional . Another issue for SCOTUS
- QV : Oh does he think HKS case is important enough to change the rule of the United States Supreme Court? Once again, ROFLMAO!
- Guest_1356 : 184. No wonder the 9th is the most reversed U.S. Appeals Court in America • Two months shy of three years after SCOTUS spoke for that thin opinion to arrive. • Old arguments and case law rehashed but not a word about the ANS SCOTUS details
- Guest_1356 : Swims is pissed at the Ninth Circuit. He used to say they would "get it right". Now he says that SCOTUS will have to amend and rule on things that the Ninth keeps making mistakes on.
- QV : Another update is on the article with some info about appeal procedures.
- QV : Hahaa..Lol!
- Guest_4942 : very funny that "swims" is having a breakdown LOL
- QV : Swims said Pierce robbed his father while he was alive. His father intended for Pierce to inherit his estate so even if he did take anything, it was his to take.
- QV : ....and forum shopping.
- QV : Well, the 9th Circuit has spoken. Marshall gave all he was going to during his life. The court is not going to disavow the wishes of the deceased. The court agreed with the Marshall family. The probate court ruled correctly and anything after that is dust in the wind.....
- QV : Ok TY
- Guest_3371 : yeah, go read his post. he says they ignored Scotus telling the ninth coa that the probate and bankruptcy were seperate core proceedings and they should rule on the other one and not the probate one.
- QV : Who got it wrong? The 9th Circuit?
- Guest_3371 : Swims posted and said they got it wrong.
- Guest_1483 : Hopefully any appeal will be quickly turned down against HKS. JMO
Captcha:
Name: URL/Email: Message:
Pages
Blogroll

Arthur vs Stern-CBS

Meta

Archives

Spam Blocked

Please Click Every Day To Feed A Hungry Stray Animal. Its Free!

Categories

QV's Chatbox

Pages

Blogroll