September  20th, 2011. Prosecutors in the Anna Nicole Smith drug trial have filed an appeal on that case saying Judge Robert Perry was biased toward the defendants and their attorneys and against the prosecution. They said that Perry created a celebrity exception to the law.

I’ve had the opportunity to speak to someone who actually attended the Anna Nicole Smith trial concerning the drugs that led to her death. Defendants Howard K. Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor were charged with excessive prescribing of opiates and sedatives to an addict, and fraudulently obtaining drugs by using false names.

I will call this person, “Courtroom Observer”. Courtroom Observer did not attend the whole trial but gave their take on what really happened in Judge Robert Perry’s courtroom during the time they attended.

The first day of the trial, as soon as Anna’s mother, Virgie Arthur, arrived, Howard K. Stern’s lawyer Steve Sadow asked to approach the judge privately. When Sadow sat back down, Judge Perry made an announcement, before anything happened to warrant such a warning, that anyone caught making comments or bothering the defendants in any way would be removed from the courtroom.

As the trial moved forward, when the court recessed for breaks and lunch, there were times that Mrs. Arthur would return early. She went directly into courtroom and sat until court was called back into session so as to avoid the large crowds in the hallways.

About 4 or 5 days into the trial, there was a break. When Mrs. Arthur returned to the courtroom a little early, she and her family were shocked to find Judge Perry, the defendants and their attorneys having a conversation about boating and vacation spots etc.. Judge Robert Perry had wheeled his chair over to the defendants table in order to have a more intimate conversation. James Arthur, Virgie’s husband commented, “there will be no justice here.” However, Mrs. Arthur remained optimistic.

The next day, after lunch, when Mr. and Mrs. Arthur and those who were with them attempted to enter the courtroom as they had since the beginning of the trial, a deputy stopped them at the door and informed them that they were no longer permitted to enter the courtroom early. The deputy then said Anna’s mother and her husband had to wait until exactly 1:30 pm to enter.

It was then very apparent that Judge Perry, who runs the courtroom, and the defendants and their lawyers didn’t want Anna Nicole’s mother and husband to see Perry socializing with them. The disturbing part was that the media and press that were attending were permitted to enter early. The media was let in but Anna’s mother and family were left sitting in the hallway. It remained that way until Mrs. Arthur had to fly back home for health reasons. The deputy was asked why the media, the defendants and their attorneys were allowed to go in early. His answer was, “well, it’s because they are the media.”

The prosecutors had extensive evidence against these defendants, but time and time again Judge Perry would not allow them to present it. His rational was that the evidence was “too inflammatory to the defendants.” You did not have to be a lawyer to know that the prosecutors were simply doing their jobs and that was to present the evidence, and let the jury hear the full story no matter how inflammatory it was especially when it was facts as presented to law enforcement during the extensive investigation.

There were times when Anna’s mother and family asked the prosecutors why they could not get a new judge to replace Perry who was so obviously biased toward the defendants. Their answer was frightening as they said “Judge Robert Perry is not the worst judge in this courthouse.”

Judge Perry made it clear from the start of the trial that he did not believe the defendants did anything wrong and at times Perry even made objections for the defense. There was so much more that may never be known because most of the prosecutors evidence was thrown out by Perry.

When the prosecutors attempted to refresh a witnesses memory as to what they reported to investigators and testified to previously, the judge would abort their testimony and say, he/she said “they don’t remember, now move on!” Or he would again say “its too inflammatory.”

One day there was a video of Anna Nicole that the prosecutors wanted to use. Perry said he would take it home and watch it and then decide if it could be shown to the jury. When the subject of the video came up while court was in session, Judge Perry said, with Anna Nicole’s mother in the courtroom, that he had watched it and he thought Anna was very entertaining in her “voluptuous” kind of way.  Anna Nicole being “voluptuous” was not the point or reason why the prosecutors wanted to show the video. It was very inappropriate for Judge Perry to speak this way about evidence presented.

Over and over Judge Perry stopped the prosecutors from trying their case. They tried their best to get important evidence and testimony admitted, but Perry was not allowing the majority of it. Perry would say it was either hearsay, inflammatory,or irrelevant.

One of the most disturbing things witnessed was when “Big Moe”, Maurice Brighthaupt was testifying. Moe had been saying “everyone agreed Anna Nicole needed rehab, but no one ever did anything about it.” In other words Moe was saying, they all admitted that Anna Nicole Smith was an addict and needed intervention. Eroshevich and her lawyer Brad Brunon were sitting immediately in front of Mrs. Arthur and family. Brunon looked at Eroshevich and sang,“They wanted her to go to rehab but she said no no no.” Brunon and Eroshevich giggled like schoolchildren. It made one wonder if it was their daughter who was the subject of the trial, if they would find it so funny.

After Judge Perry threw out the jury verdicts, Los Angeles D.A. Steve Cooley had this to say:

“The jury deliberated more than two weeks and reached a fair and thorough verdict in accordance with the law and the evidence we were allowed to present.  Judge Perry’s ruling today is totally inconsistent with his previous rulings at the preliminary hearing, the trial itself and once again when the defense concluded their case. Each time, he refused to dismiss the conspiracy counts. The evidence has not changed from that time to now,” said Cooley.”

“His decision denigrates the substantial investigative efforts conducted by the state Department of Justice and the Medical Board,” said the L.A. District Attorney’s office in a statement. “It diminishes the huge social problem of prescription drug abuse facilitated by irresponsible caretakers and unscrupulous medical professionals …We will immediately pursue all appellate remedies to overturn Judge Perry’s decision.”

* Note. This is the same Judge Perry who appointed himself as a jury of one in the Oscar Grant killing. Basically Perry was saying the jury was stupid like he implied in the Anna Nicole Smith farce of a trial.

Anna Nicole Smith trial scam. September 20th, 2010

Judge Robert Perry is up for reelection and does not want the doctors and pill poppers voting against him. That’s the only reason that I can think of for his apparent love affair with the defense in The State of California vs Howard K. Stern, Khristine Eroshevich and Sandeep Kapoor.

In reference to this article by AP Reporter Linda Deutsch, I have a lot of questions for this judge.

Did any doctor order testing such as, MRI, CT  and other brain scans, EMG, GI tests, extensive blood work etc…  for Anna Nicole Smith to rule out other conditions to arrive at this diagnosis of  “Chronic Pain Syndrome”? I do hope the court remembers there was no disease found in Anna Nicole’s body at autopsy to warrant the drugs she was taking. Anna Nicole also did NOT suffer with seizures as a child.

When was “Chronic Pain Syndrome” diagnosed and by whom?

Is this diagnosis of “Chronic Pain Syndrome” in any of her records?

What about the other tranquilizers and sleep drugs and muscle relaxers that she was taking?

Those were:

Xanax (Tranquilizer)

Oxazepam (Tranquilizer)

Valium (Tranquilizer)

Lorazepam (Tranquilizer)

Klonopin (Tranquilizer and sometimes seizures)

Ambien (Sleep)

Chloral Hydrate (Sleep medication)

Soma (Muscle Relaxer)

Robaxin (Muscle Relaxer)

Chloral Hydrate (Sleep), Klonopin (Tranquilizer), Valium (Tranquilizer), Oxazepam (Tranquilizer), Lorazepam (Tranquilizer) and Bendaryl (which causes sleepiness and magnifies the effect the other drugs) were ALL FOUND IN Anna Nicole’s AUTOPSY RESULTS. She was taking all of the same class of drugs at the same time which was over-kill and it certainly did kill her.

The most incredible part is if I am reading her autopsy correctly, the only pain medicine that was in her system was a small amount of methadone found in bile of her liver. If she had “Chronic Pain Syndrome”, why was she not using pain medicines at her death???

Did Anna Nicole exhibit drug seeking behaviors? She didn’t have to. She had Kim Walthers, Howard K. Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and others to do her dirty work for her.They were the ones doing the seeking with Kapoor even acknowledging possible “Benzo” addiction in his journal.

Instead of breaking the law to keep Anna Nicole in supply of truckloads of drugs, they could have engaged a real professional and done an Intervention for her. Watch the dang show on TV, Judge Perry. It shows how even horribly addicted people still have plenty of lucid moments.

And where’s the perjury threat and witness coaching accusation for the so called prosecution witnesses Birkhead, Big Moe, Ford and Gina Shelley? They all changed their stories and they all had personal interest to do so no matter if they did it before or now. If you take every single person who is not an expert and has testified in this trial, the only ones who came close to replicating prior testimony or interviews were the two nannies. All their prior statements are available.  Those affidavits they signed were altered after or the wording was not all read to those women because when they found out about what the affidavits really said back in 2007, they went on American national television to complain about their signatures being on statements that were altered or not explained to them.

I hope for the sake of no more “death by entourage” happening, this case is retried if it keeps heading the way it is and not by Judge Robert Perry.

“Celebrity doctors to the stars”, you are free to keep writing scripts for those addicts so they will adore you and allow you into their private circles.

Celeb and rich people addicts. You can keep selling your souls for drugs you should not be taking thanks to Judge Robert Perry.

Don’t forget to vote!

Sadow Falsely Claims Big Moe Paid To Testify About Stern Injecting Anna Nicole

Yesterday in Los Angeles Maurice Brighthaupt (“Big Moe”) spent his second day on the stand in the preliminary hearing to decide if Howard K. Stern, and doctors Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich will go to trial for  illegally supplying drugs to Anna Nicole Smith. The same drugs killed her on February 8th, 2007 at the Hard Rock Hotel in Hollywood Florida.

The Los Angeles Times quoted Sadow as saying that Brighthaupts allegations of Howard K. Stern injecting Anna Nicole Smith with drugs are false and a new allegation. Not so!

Sources say Big Moe spoke to the California DOJ two days after Lin Wood and Howard K. Stern accused Brighthaupt of trying to sell pictures of Anna Nicole. The accusation first came via Stern’s mouthpiece Entertainment Tonight on October 3rd of 2007. They again attacked Brighthaupt on Larry King Live on October 10th, 2007.

Big Moe was interviewed by Access Hollywood on October 17th 2007. That was when he revealed for the first time that he saw Howard cooking drugs on a spoon and injecting them into Anna Nicole.

So here is the time line

October 3rd, 2007 – Lin Wood issues a statement to Entertainment Tonight accusing Brighthaupt (Big Moe) of selling pics and says they have been accusing him since shortly after Wood was retained. Moe denies selling anything through his rep. Paul Porter.

October 10th, 2007 – Howard K. Stern and Lin Wood appear on Larry King Live with same accusations.

October 12th, 2007 – According to Sadow, Moe talked to the CA DOJ

October 17th, 2007 – Moe appears on Access Hollywood and says he saw Stern cooking drugs and injecting them into Anna Nicole.

So Sadow’s own words disprove his point. If Moe talked to the CA DOJ two days after the Larry King Live interview, that would have been October 12th. Moe did not appear in any live interviews until October 17th. The point is, Moe told the DOJ what he is testifying to before he got paid by or appeared for any media outlets.

Also, where is Lin Wood? It was announced by Reuters and others that he is part of Stern’s defense team. Could it be that Wood is trying to extricate himself from Howard K. Stern? The King siblings case which Wood was working on has been settled but still no appearance by Lin Wood in California.

The man who designed Anna Nicole’s commitment ceremony dress and his partner have a new tell all book ready for purchase. Anna is pictured below in the gown with Howard K. Stern and “Big Moe” Brighthaupt.

In this book you see Anna Nicole as funny, beautiful, sexy, naughty, a wonderful mother, a true confidant, but most of all…a friend. Pol’ and Patrik were privy to private thoughts which included: Was Larry Birkhead bi-sexual? Did she really love Howard K. Stern? What sort of antics did her hated mother Virgie try to pull?

Larry Birkhead told the “New York Daily News” yesterday: “They are absolutely crazy, their stories are false, and they will be sued.”

It also looks like if the promo is any indication of what is in the book, Virgie Arthur may also have some objections.

Maurice Brighthaupt aka “Big Moe”, Anna Nicole Smith’s former bodyguard and friend has placed a bulletin on his MySpace page.

He states the following concerning a rumored recent illness.
I didn’t have a heart attack or a stroke. Thats just misinformation from a tabloid Magazine, but thanks for your prayers and support. And by the way Ford Shelly just said on Geraldo he put out the pictures of Anna. So someone owes me a big public apology don’t you?

“Someone” certainly does owe you a big public apology Moe. But I would not hold my breath. It takes courage and fortitude to admit you were wrong and apologize. “Someone” doesn’t seem to have that quality.

Later on, this site will have more coverage of last nights Geraldo show which vindicated Moe. There will also be video for those that missed the show.

The National Enquirer and TMZ are the internet sites that reported that Anna Nicole’s Big Moe was the one to have the heart attack. Actually it was a rap artist that also uses the name “Big Moe”. Thanks Vivian…

Link 

The National Enquirer broke the story that former bodyguard and friend of Anna Nicole Smith, Big Moe has recently suffered a heart attack and stroke. We wish Moe well and hope that he will take care of himself and realize a complete recovery.

Will there ever be a conclusion to this story? Probably not, but one thing is for sure. Most of us never thought that the life and subsequent death of a B list model actress could cause such a world wide controversy. However, as always, may Anna Nicole and her son Daniel rest in eternal peace.

In case you missed it the other night, here is the video clip of Howard and his attorney Lin Wood accusing Big Moe of theft. (Video will be reposted later).

Tony Potts has interviewed Maurice (“Big Moe”) Brighthaupt. The Access Hollywood segment begins showing a previously recorded clip made soon after Anna Nicole died. Potts states that Big Moe has always supported Howard K Stern 100%. Until now.

Part two is to air tomorrow where Moe reveals “Anna was not an out of control junkie, but a woman that was deeply depressed”.