Here is a surprise!

It appears that Virgie Arthur’s lawsuit for conspiracy and defamation will go forward after all.

http://qvsplace.com/090810_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Trail_Prep_80th_Letter.PDF

The original defendants included Howard K. Stern, Larry Birkhead, Art Harris, Harvey Levin,  TMZ Productions and CBS Studios. All of those defendants have been released from the suit for various reasons.

The trial will go forward on September 27th, with the three remaining defendants, Nelda “Rose” Turner, Lyndal Harrington and Bonnie Stern.

Nelda “Rose” Turner’s motion to designate Art Harris’s company Busy Street Productions as a responsible third party is set for submission without oral argument on June 28. Under current law, the trial judge must grant the motion, unless he finds the allegations in the motion to be insufficient. If he finds the allegations insufficient, he must give Turner an opportunity to amend the motion to cure any defect in the allegations. If the motion is granted, that will put Mrs. Arthur in a position to seek to add the company as a defendant.

Several matters are set for Aug. 6, 2010:

• The issue of whether or not Howard K. Stern must go to Houston to be deposed.

• Howard K. Stern’s special appearance to contest Texas jurisdiction.

• Mrs. Arthur’s motion to compel Howard K. Stern to respond to her discovery requests.

• Mrs. Arthur’s objection to Alternate Dispute Resolution.

TMZ/Harvey Levin’s summary judgment motion, which was submitted some time ago,  still is pending.

The  document below mentions the three appellate court cases pending and how they affect the trial court case.

Virgie Arthur filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Howard K. Stern for breaking an agreement that he would not urge his special appearance until after he was deposed. Stern was served with those papers a week ago. It is Case No. 201034873 in the 127th District Court. Stern has a motion pending to clarify or set aside that agreement and that will also be heard on Aug. 6th.

The current docket control order, which is attached as part of the objection to Alternate Dispute Resolution, lists deadlines and trial date. The trial court must rule on special appearances before the case goes to trial.  The losing side on that issue has a right to an immediate appeal, which automatically keeps the trial from starting.  Therefore, the trial should not be expected to begin on or about 9/27/10.

http://qvsplace.com/062510_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_Object_to_ADR.PDF

Check this out while you are at it.

http://nevadanewsandviews.com/2010/06/26/anna-nicole-smith-auction-in-vegas-a-big-rip-off/

Well, it’s been awhile and I’m behind. I hope no one cares if I get myself caught up out loud here.

When I left, I believe it was toward the end of May. In Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern et al, in Houston Texas 280th District Court, one of the defendants Lyndal Harrington ending up being sent to jail for not complying with the courts order to turn over her computer. Harrington claimed that her home was burglarized and her computer was stolen. The policeman who took the report testified he believed the robbery was staged. Presiding Honorable Judge Tony Lindsay apparently did not believe Ms. Harrington’s story either and ordered Harrington to jail for contempt.

Judge Lindsay released Harrington after spending four days incarcerated and in a subsequent hearing, Harrington agreed to give access to her email accounts to the appointed Special Master Forensic Expert Craig Ball. He would then make a privilege log for Harrington to examine before anything is submitted, as I understand things.  I also believe that Harrington is still expected to produce her computer and case followers wonder why Harrington did not make the effort before to produce her email accounts.

In California, Los Angeles Superior court, case #BC397417, there is Howard K. Stern vs Mark Speer and Jackie Hatten. Although I have not seen the paperwork, it appears that Stern has dropped his case against Speer who was providing body guard services for Larry Birkhead. I remember being shocked when Stern filed this suit as sources said Mr. Speer was to give a deposition in Stern’s defamation case against Rita Cosby and her publisher possibly the next day.  Two words would cover my personal opinion on this. Witness intimidation?  It appears the part of the case against former friend of Anna Nicole Smith, Jackie Hatten is still active.

In another interrelated California case, Howard K. Stern’s sister Bonnie Stern filed bankruptcy just prior to the deadline in which she was supposed to turn her computer over to the Special Master in the late Anna Nicole Smith’s mother, Mrs. Virgie Arthur’s defamation, libel and conspiracy to defame case. The defendants in that case are Howard K. Stern, journalist Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin,  Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner of rosepeaks.com.

The bankruptcy stayed the case until Neil McCabe, attorney for Mrs. Arthur got the stay lifted so the case could at least proceed against the other defendants. Ms. Stern’s bankruptcy was finally discharged and the case continued against her with the main issue being Ms. Stern’s refusal to turn over her computer and electronic media to the Special Master. Later on, when Ms. Harrington was sent to jail, somehow Ms. Stern got the notion that there was an arrest warrant out for her so she made arrangements to ship her computers to Mr. Ball. She like others was told not to tamper with her computer but she did not comply.  Forensic Expert Mr. Ball to whom she finally sent her computers to because she thought she was going to be arrested examined her media and using very strong language said that deliberate deleting of material had taken place. Judge Lindsay agreed and granted Mr. McCabe’s request for a default judgment against Bonnie Stern as to liability which will be decided after the trial which is scheduled for the summer of 2010.

While Mr. McCabe was in California taking care of business concerning Bonnie Stern’s bankruptcy, he was in the neighborhood to see Howard K. Stern, Dr’s Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich’s arraignment on felony drug charges in connection with the death of Anna Nicole Smith.

It was also reported that Mr. McCabe and Don Clark were in the neighborhood to hear oral arguments for summary judgment for Cosby in Howard K. Stern vs Rita Cosby and Hatchette Books in New York. Only one rag mag covered the hearing and it was the New York Post. If you will remember their scurrilous article, “Now That’s Not Nice Granny”, they took a quote from Lin Wood who is the attorney for Howard K. Stern in the Cosby case. Apparently the writer took something out of context that Judge Chin, who was presiding on this case said, with Stern’s attorney Wood embellishing upon it.  The line from The Post said, “One point that I find troubling is that Anna Nicole Smith would entertain herself by watching this videotape, said Chin.”

A more accurate depiction I am told, would be Judge Denny Chin was confounded as to why a woman would want to repeatedly watch two people she supposedly had been intimate with “getting it on”.

As people who follow these inter-related Anna Nicole Smith cases know, there has been some pretty creative lawyering on both sides of the fence. One of them was when Attorney Lin Wood for Howard K. Stern was filing a sworn statement he elicited from Nelda Turner a defendant in the Texas State case with almost all the courts where Stern had cases. Well oops, apparently Wood did not keep up with the facts in what is called the “blogger case” because he ended up withdrawing what he filed.

I have not been following Stern’s case against Ford Shelley and G. Ben Thompson closely but did have an opportunity to read some of the latest and will reserve my thoughts for when more information is available because it appears to me that the two men may be doing some back peddling. When only snippets are presented in the legal documents, it’s hard to see what is really going on.  I do know this though. Thompson and Shelley have apparently turned over what they had which belongs to the estate of Anna Nicole Smith. I suppose the question now will be if the estate been damaged or not. Again, case followers have seen items that are purported to have belonged to Anna Nicole Smith for sale on Ebay with the seller being out of California, not South Carolina where Shelley and Thompson reside. I’ll leave the rest to your imagination.

Finally, in the Harris County “blogger case”, Arthur vs Stern et al, another defendant is trying to circumvent the system and not obey a court order and this is even after Harrington did jail time and Bonnie Stern had a default judgment declared against her in the same case.

Teresa Stephens was ordered in early May of this year to turn over her “electronic media” aka computer, any exterior drives etc…  and it still has not happened. She informed the court that she would be present at a hearing that she scheduled on July 17th along with other motions in the same case that were to be heard that day. According to published reports, Judge Lindsay was ready to issue a warrant when Stephens did not show up but Mrs. Arthur’s attorney said he was informed that Stephens had filed an appeal that may have stayed any proceedings against her so he opted to give Stephens a break to “wait and see”. However, when Mr. McCabe contacted the clerk for the appellate court, he was informed they have received no such document.

McCabe filed a motion denying statements Stephens had made to the court and requested a Capias order. An order for the arrest of Theresa Stephens has now been issued with Arthur being charged a $3000 bond for the cost of bringing Ms. Stephens from where she lives around Dallas Texas to Houston.

Also in Harris County, there was a July 31st hearing scheduled for Larry Birkhead’s Special Appearance but that will be rescheduled for a later time.

While I have been offline, I was sad to see the news about the death of Michael Jackson. I grew up with his music and along with my children thought he was an exceptional entertainer. Another troubling aspect of his death is the similarity to what happened to Anna Nicole Smith and her son Daniel. In fact, the last person to see Michael alive was a Houston Texas doctor and as more facts come to light, I’m hearing the term, “death by entourage” used over and over again. It has been interesting and gratifying to see the state of California and other agencies aggressively pursuing this tragic case. It will be interesting to see how this case affects the felony drug charges brought against Howard K. Stern and Dr’s Kapoor and Eroshevich.

Also notable is the fact that Mrs. Virgie Arthur was declared next of kin in the California criminal case due to Proposition 9 which is also called Marsey’s Law. I’ll save writing about that for another day.

The decisions made today by the Honorable Judge Lindsay relate to parts 1 and 3 of Virgie Arthur’s attorney Neil McCabe’s requests for production from last fall in her defamation and conspiracy to defame lawsuit against the parties below.

Howard K. Stern and Teresa Stephens must give their computers to Forensic Examiner  Craig Ball by 10 days after today’s order is signed. The order is expected to be signed by Monday.

Art Harris must give his hard drive to  Craig Ball by May 19. There are contempt and other sanctions possible if he does not comply or if he deleted anything from his computer.

Nelda Turner is given until May 22nd to produce what she has withheld.

Lyndal Harrington and Bonnie Stern are to appear in court on May 21 to show cause why they should not be held in contempt.  They were not present at today’s hearing and neither was Teresa Stephens.

Next court date is Monday at 3:00 pm on the proposed orders.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harrington_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_Response_Sterns_Motion_to_Cancel_050709.pdf

Judge Lindsay held a telephone conference today as a result of the emergency hearing filed by Howard K. Stern’s counsel Lin Wood.

Judge Lindsay will not hear the motion for sanctions. She said since it involves the recusal which was denied, the issue should be brought before Judge Underwood.

Tomorrow Judge Lindsay said she will hear the motion of Art Harris to “clarify” the order to turn over his computer. Also she will decide whether and when to hear the motions for contempt on Bonnie Stern, Art Harris, and Lyndal Harrington.

Judge Lindsay will also hear the motions to compel Howard K. Stern and Teresa Stephens and Nelda Turner to turn over their computers.

The Judge said she will not hear Teresa’s motions (injunction, whatever), because it has not been properly served to the required parties.

One more note;

Bonnie Stern’s motion for reconsideration has been DENIED by the California bankruptcy judge and this was done before McCabe could file any opposition.

And a reminder;

The motion to compel Bonnie Stern was granted in January.

Things are really heating up in the interconnected lawsuits which have resulted since the death of Anna Nicole Smith.

In Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern journalist Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin,  Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner, attorney’s for Virgie Arthur filed a second motion for sanctions against defendant Howard K. Stern and his counsel Lin Wood and a motion for contempt against Lin Wood.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_Sanctions__Contempt_HStern_Wood.pdf

Bonnie Stern, a defendant in the above suit, in California filed a motion to Reconsider the Order Granting Relief from the Automatic Stay in the bankruptcy she filed after this case commenced. In the meantime Arthur filed a motion for contempt against her in Texas.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Contempt_motion_Bonnie_Stern.pdf

Thanks to Carole for the California documents.

Bonnie Stern’s Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Relief from Automatic Stay
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSMotReconsider.pdf

McCabe’s Court appearance transcript
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSExh2.pdf

Complaint for Determintation of Non-dischageable Debt under Chapter 11
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSExh3.pdf
********************

**New Docs!**

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_for_Emergency_Hearing_on_Motion_to_Cancel-Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_to_Cancel-Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Response_to_Harris_Motion_to_Clarify.pdf

After a flurry of motions, sworn statements and joinders,  Administrative Judge Olen Underwood denied Howard K. Sterns motion to recuse Judge Tony Lindsay who was presiding over the case of Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern, and others.

Mrs. Arthur filed a conspiracy and defamation case that was originally assigned to the 190th District Court in Harris County Texas. The case saw no action so it was moved to the 280th District and the Honorable Judge Tony Lindsay in September of 2008.

In December of 2008, four of the defendants lost their attorney due to various reasons. Some gave the reason of lack of funds, other reasons given were conflict of interest. Either before or shortly after, one defendant, Nelda Turner decided she wanted out of the lawsuit and contacted Mrs. Arthurs attorney Neil McCabe and began to turn over evidence.

Turner has stated on her website she turned over five to six DVD’s full of emails to McCabe concerning the bloggers, defendants and witnesses in this case and publicly wrote a statement of cooperation. Suddenly Turner came up with an attorney, reneiged on whatever agreements she had with counsel for Arthur, gave a sworn statement that was in direct opposition to emails revealed between herself and McCabe and statements she made on her website.

Howard K. Stern’s counsel Lin Wood filed a motion to recuse the judge on the case apparently based upon statements made by Turner and a rumor of ex-parte communications between McCabe, Judge Lindsay and Judge Wise who was the one who moved the case.

Sources who attended the hearing today say that when Judge Underwood asked for evidence of Judge Lindsay’s misconduct from Attorney Luke Lantta who was filling in for Lin Wood, he did not have any actual evidence other than Turners statement. Underwood ruled “motion denied”.

The case was previously stayed by defendant Bonnie Stern filing bankruptcy but McCabe for Arthur filed a motion with the bankruptcy court in California and got the stay lifted.

Now the case can continue and it promises to be quite interesting as it involves not only Mrs. Arthur, the mother of the late Anna Nicole Smith but Smith’s companion and attorney Howard K. Stern, journalist and CNN coorespondant Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin, the father of Anna Nicole’s infant daughter, Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner.

Yours truly is a witness in the case as well as another blogger Chrystal Baker who goes by the moniker Havana. If I am able to provide anymore details, Ill update this page.

Signed order denying recusal of Judge

**Updates**

Lack of evidence was indeed the reason for the ruling today and Judge Lindsay will be presiding again, because Judge Underwood signed the order denying recusal.

Before Mrs. Arthur can proceed against Bonnie Stern, the bankruptcy judge in California must sign the order reflecting his ruling from the bench. Ms. Stern can appeal that ruling if she so desires.

The issue of sanctions was postponed due to Stern’s attorney Lin Wood’s absence and will be addressed at a later time.

To explain the issue about Judge Wise and the transfer of the case; An affidavit was admitted into evidence from Judge Wise, saying that, after Mr. McCabe filed his motion to reconsider the transfer of the case from Judge Kerrigan (190th) to Judge Lindsay (280th) (in other words, McCabe’s motion asked Judge Wise to send the case back to Judge Kerrigan), Judge Wise asked both other judges what they thought of the motion to reconsider transfer. Judge Lindsay responded by email, and Judge Wise had already decided not to grant the motion to reconsider.  Apparently before Judge Wise could deny the motion, McCabe withdrew it. Everything was done  properly. Judge Wise was not present at the hearing.

Wood let Luke Lantta, a four-year lawyer, take the bullet for him.  Also present was Herring, managing partner of the Dallas Bryan Cave office, who let Mr. Lantta take the loss.

Howard K. Stern was not present. Lyndal Harrington was. Attorney Mike Meyer handled the hearing. McCabe was of course present and testified. Attorney John O’Quinn was present, and so was Don Clark. Mr. McCabe’s paralegal Patti Lampton was there, and Jonathan Stoger, another O’Quinn lawyer who has helped with Mrs. Arthur’s case was there too. So was WV.

Defendant Art Harris had Chip Babcock to carry and fumble the ball; also Amanda Bush, and Nancy Hamilton.

Nelda’s Turner’s lawyer was there as well. As far as what happens next, Judge Lindsay takes over so we wait and see.

Latest documents filed in the 280th Harris County District Court of Houston Texas, defamation complaint of  Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern and  Journalist Art Harris, Bonnie Stern,  TMZ.com, Harvey Levin, Larry Birkhead and bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and Nelda Rose Turner.

Also Neil McCabe, Arthur’s attorney filed a response with the Florida court in Howard K. Stern vs John O’Quinn stating they are not opposed to releasing the full confidential depositon of Don Clark to the California Department of Justice who arrested  Howard K. Stern on felony drug charges.

1) Plaintiffs motion to cancel deposition of Neil McCabe

040109_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_cancel_McCabe_depo.pdf

2) Plaintiffs motion to cancel deposition of Nelda Turner

040109_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_cancel_Turner_depo.pdf

3) Plaintiff’s supplemental statement opposing defendant Howard K. Stern’s verified motion to recuse the Honorable Tony Lindsay

040109_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Plaintiffs_supplement_opposition_to_recusal.pdf

4) Plaintiff’s response to defendant Nelda Turner’s motion to quash deposition notice and motion for protective order.

040109_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Plantiffs_response_Turners_quash_motion.pdf

5) Defendant Teresa Stephens letter in support of recusal of Judge Lindsay

040109_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stephens_letter_recusal.pdf

6) O’Quinns response to Howard K. Stern’s motion for the California Department of Justice to be designated as a qualified recipient of the confidential portions of the deposition of Don Clark. O’Quinn says he has no problem with Stern’s request.

Stern_vs_OQuinn_040209_267.pdf

Exhibits For Plaintiff’s Supplemental Statement Opposing Defendant Howard K. Stern’s Verified Motion to Recuse the Honorable Tony Lindsay

Exhibit A

Exhibit B 156 pages of emails

Exhibit C

Exhibit D

Exhibit E

Exhibit F

Exhibit G

Exhibit H

*******

And to put the documents in perspective, here are the original filings to which the above Harris County documents are in answer to.

A) Howard K. Stern’s motion to recuse Judge Lindsay

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Houston_Motion_to_recuse.pdf

B) Virgie Arthur’s statement opposing Stern’s motion to recuse and attachments.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Plantiff_Statement_Opposing_Recuse_Motion.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Exhibits_G-N_Opposition_to_Recusal.pdf

C) Defendant Nelda Turner’s motion to quash deposition notice and motion for protective order can be found here labeled as “Nelda’s Motion to Quash Subpoena”

UPDATE 04/04/09

Virgie Arthur’s response to defendant Nelda Turner’s motion to quash deposition notice and motion for protective order.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_Sup_Response_Turner_Motion_to_Quash.pdf

Lin Wood resquests emails between Judge Lindsay and Judge Wise and Judge Lindsay and any court employee concerning Arthur vs Stern et al.    http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/eDoc

There was an early morning hearing today in what is called “the blogger case” in this continuing story of all things Anna Nicole Smith.

The case is the complaint filed in the 280th Harris County District Court in Houston Texas, by Virgie Arthur, mother of Anna Nicole Smith against defendants, Howard K. Stern, Journalist Art Harris, Bonnie Stern,  TMZ.com, Harvey Levin, Larry Birkhead and bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and Nelda Rose Turner.

In a nutshell, the attorney for Howard K. Stern, Lin Wood was present and immediately filed a motion to recuse the judge on the case, Judge Tony Lindsay. Judge Lindsay read the motion and announced that she will deny it.

An administrative judge will now be required to hear Wood’s motion.

The administrative judge who may hear the case or appoint another judge to hear this motion is  The Honorable Judge Olen Underwood.

There is now a stay on the whole case until the motion is heard.

Motion: Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Houston_Motion_to_recuse.pdf

**UPDATE**  **UPDATE**  **UPDATE**

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Plantiff_Statement_Opposing_Recuse_Motion.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Exhibits_G-N_Opposition_to_Recusal.pdf

How to begin to write about something so heinous, devious and disgusting is a dilemma. Where do you start?

It’s a tale of people gone too far in their “support” of someone they will never meet. It’s a tale of dirty back door dealings and not only criminal but immoral behavior. All in the name of helping someone who was present when two young people died.

It all started with the death of Anna Nicole Smith and her son Daniel Smith and has come full circle back to individuals on the internet who gathered to blog and chat in support of Howard K. Stern.

Anna Nicole Smith’s mother Virgie Arthur has sued Howard K. Stern, his sister Bonnie Stern, Journalist Art Harris, Larry Birkhead, TMZ Productions and its managing editor, Harvey Levin. She is also suing bloggers Nelda (Rose) Turner,  owner of Rose Speaks.com and Teresa Stephens and Houston, Texas Real Estate Agent Lyndal Harrington.

In a stunning motion for contempt filed today by Houston Texas O’Quinn Law Firm’s Neil McCabe, in the case, much background and laying the ground for what is charged to be a conspiracy to defame Virgie Arthur has been revealed and it’s not pretty.

The most disturbing facts presented in the public court documents today have been the stalking and harassment of a female investigator on the case, Wilma Vicedomine.

McCabe outlines evidence that Ms. Vicedomine USPS mail was stolen from her home. Her trash was ransacked and stolen. Her mail and trash were photographed by Lyndal Harrington and the photos were sent to Art Harris and Rose Turner.

In the court documents, some of the mail that was stolen from Ms. Vicedomine’s home included her phone bill. Bloggers who had been in contact with Ms. Vicedomine have found they have been the victims of harassing phone calls and wondered how their phone numbers were obtained. Now they possibly have an answer.

As a parent though, I am most distressed by the words of Rose Turner in a plan for Journalist Art Harris regarding the theft of Vicedomine’s trash.

Art Harris has been promised the exclusive on all of this to break slowly and we have always honored that with him. He is a news blog we are just a legalese discussion blog.

Later this week after things have been sorted we should know cigarette brands, food, computer used and printer, and her child’s Xmas wish list as well as who her daughter has a crush on, about everything that several garbage bags can yield.

Once that is sorted and all of it is listed will send that along as well.

Rose      (Exhibit E, page 3.)

I asked Wilma Vicedomine how this turn of events has affected her and the life of her child who Turner mercilessly targets.  She, of course knew about the thefts but not the invasive mission into the privacy of her young daughter until recently.

Back in April of 2008, Ms Vicedomine tearfully told me that things have been rough for her daughter but she did not go into detail until now.

Her daughter is a skate boarder who loves the outdoors but since taking on this case almost two years ago,  Ms. Vicedomine has had to keep her child indoors at all times to insure her safety.

Deviants whose mission is to ruin anyone opposed to Howard K. Stern, who go as far as to pry into the details of a child’s life have caused Ms Vicedomine to seek the help of local police who have had her home under surveillance since these incidents have come to light.

Being in the investigative business has taught Vicedomine not to ever put a phone bill in her trash thus the discovery that her mail has been stolen was reported to her local Post Master as well.

Another revelation from evidence that Rose Turner herself submitted was that L. Lin Wood and Krista Barth who are attorneys for Howard K. Stern knew about the theft of the trash.

Email from Art Harris to Lyndal Harrington that is included in the documents.

U are my sin-sniffing dream girl. Where have you been all my life? You remind me of me in my early reporting days, and what you have instinctively cannot be taught to j school students unless they’ve got a certain gene and heavy metal, or at least the right deodorizer to spray away the stench of evil. Maybe we got a new product: “Evil Does It: The Antidote”. Redacted…
Way to go! Lin and Krista have been told of your exploits, but not your name and promise secrecy. In the event this stuff comes into play in the upcoming depos….redacted……, would u be willing to give an affidavit as to how you came into possession of them? Redacted….

Well sir, we were on a neighborhood watch one night and were struck the the odor of something fishy..and grabbed the bag for further inspection, and indeed there was….etc….

Shower well. You deserve a spa day. TBT

Art Harris
Busy Street Productions.

—————-

More tomorrow!

Arthur_vs_Stern_et_al_Motion_for_contempt_Art_Harris.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_Motion_for_Contempt_Ex_ A-C.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_for_Contempt_Exh_D-E.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_for_Contempt_Exh_F-H.pdf