Here is a surprise!

It appears that Virgie Arthur’s lawsuit for conspiracy and defamation will go forward after all.

http://qvsplace.com/090810_Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Trail_Prep_80th_Letter.PDF

The original defendants included Howard K. Stern, Larry Birkhead, Art Harris, Harvey Levin,  TMZ Productions and CBS Studios. All of those defendants have been released from the suit for various reasons.

The trial will go forward on September 27th, with the three remaining defendants, Nelda “Rose” Turner, Lyndal Harrington and Bonnie Stern.

Question: What do Virgie Arthur and Michael Lohan have in common?

Answer: Both are parents of celebrity drug addicted children who have used mainstream media in an attempt to save the lives of their children.

Virgie Arthur, the mother of late model and actress Anna Nicole Smith, spent her daughter’s adulthood worrying about her. The two women ended up with a contentious relationship due to Anna Nicole’s drug use and Mrs. Arthur’s attempts to help her stop using. However, according to court records, they never completely severed ties.

The situation exploded into tragedy September 10th, 2006 when Anna Nicole’s son, Daniel Wayne Smith died suddenly of a methadone overdose within hours of arriving in the Bahamas to meet his three day old baby sister, Dannielynn.

Daniel Smith was not a drug user or abuser. A Bahamian inquest commenced and Doctor Lee Hern, lab director for the Miami-Dade County medical examiner’s office, said he felt Daniel’s death was the result of an “intentional” overdose. However all parties agreed that Daniel’s death was not a suicide. Daniel would have had to take six to eight 10mg tablets for the levels of methadone found in his body. Dr Hern testified that Daniel was not a habitual drug user and he had never seen anyone take methadone on a recreational basis in that quantity. There was fresh bruising on Daniels body that has never been explained and was not due to resuscitation efforts.

Mrs. Arthur’s attorney Neil McCabe, stated in court filings that after Daniel died, Anna Nicole tried calling her mother to tell her about his death. Mrs. Arthur was unable to answer the phone so Anna Nicole attempted to leave a message. The message stops when the call was abruptly disconnected by Howard K. Stern. Mrs. Arthur was in fear for Anna Nicole’s life but was never able to reach her daughter again.

Desperate to warn Anna Nicole, Mrs. Arthur, a retired 26 year Harris County, Texas Sheriffs Deputy went to the media in an attempt to get a message to her daughter. She told her to be careful of the people who surround her or she may be next. Mrs. Arthur’s worst fear came true on February 8th, 2007 when her world famous daughter also died of a drug overdose. Mrs. Arthur’s unmarried daughter’s body was given in the end to two men who enrich themselves exploiting Anna Nicole’s memory. Mrs. Arthur is not permitted to see her granddaughter Dannielynn and those same two men use that adorable innocent child just like a miniature Anna Nicole aka cash cow.

The State of California is now prosecuting Howard K.Stern for eleven felony counts in connection with obtaining and supplying the drugs that killed Anna Nicole Smith. The State of California under Marsy’s law, has notified Mrs. Arthur that she is next of kin for the criminal proceedings which start August 4th, 2010. The father of Smith’s daughter Dannielynn could also apply on his daughter’s behalf for next of kin status however, Birkhead has proclaimed his support for Stern even though some of the most damning evidence of enabling Anna Nicole’s drug abuse originated with Birkhead in his attempt to be recognized as the father of Dannielynn.

Lindsay Lohan, a child actress who starred in popular movies such as, “The Parent Trap”, “Freaky Friday” and “Herby: Fully Loaded” has also drifted down the wrong road to alcohol and substance abuse. In 2006, Lindsay was known to have been attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. But by July of 2007, she had three stints of rehab under her belt*. By August of the same year, she pled guilty to possession of cocaine and DUI. She admitted that her life had become unmanageable due to being addicted to alcohol and drugs.

Most recently Lindsay has been sentenced by Judge Marsha Revel in LA Superior Court to 90 days in county jail and 90 days in a substance abuse program for violating probation after she missed seven court-ordered weekly alcohol counseling sessions during the 27 week period between December 2009 and July 2010.

Unlike the Anna Nicole Smith case where her lawyer/companion Howard K. Stern, (along with his sister Bonnie Stern, Journalist Art Harris,  Harvey Levin of  TMZ and Larry Birkhead) conspired to assassinate Arthur’s character with manufactured information using the media in order to turn public opinion against her, Michael Lohan comes forward attempting to save his daughter with his own set of problems.

Link to Michael Lohan’s letter to the judge in Lindsay’s case.

* Wiki Lindsay Lohan

**New York Daily News

***USMagazine

Well, it’s been awhile and I’m behind. I hope no one cares if I get myself caught up out loud here.

When I left, I believe it was toward the end of May. In Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern et al, in Houston Texas 280th District Court, one of the defendants Lyndal Harrington ending up being sent to jail for not complying with the courts order to turn over her computer. Harrington claimed that her home was burglarized and her computer was stolen. The policeman who took the report testified he believed the robbery was staged. Presiding Honorable Judge Tony Lindsay apparently did not believe Ms. Harrington’s story either and ordered Harrington to jail for contempt.

Judge Lindsay released Harrington after spending four days incarcerated and in a subsequent hearing, Harrington agreed to give access to her email accounts to the appointed Special Master Forensic Expert Craig Ball. He would then make a privilege log for Harrington to examine before anything is submitted, as I understand things.  I also believe that Harrington is still expected to produce her computer and case followers wonder why Harrington did not make the effort before to produce her email accounts.

In California, Los Angeles Superior court, case #BC397417, there is Howard K. Stern vs Mark Speer and Jackie Hatten. Although I have not seen the paperwork, it appears that Stern has dropped his case against Speer who was providing body guard services for Larry Birkhead. I remember being shocked when Stern filed this suit as sources said Mr. Speer was to give a deposition in Stern’s defamation case against Rita Cosby and her publisher possibly the next day.  Two words would cover my personal opinion on this. Witness intimidation?  It appears the part of the case against former friend of Anna Nicole Smith, Jackie Hatten is still active.

In another interrelated California case, Howard K. Stern’s sister Bonnie Stern filed bankruptcy just prior to the deadline in which she was supposed to turn her computer over to the Special Master in the late Anna Nicole Smith’s mother, Mrs. Virgie Arthur’s defamation, libel and conspiracy to defame case. The defendants in that case are Howard K. Stern, journalist Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin,  Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner of rosepeaks.com.

The bankruptcy stayed the case until Neil McCabe, attorney for Mrs. Arthur got the stay lifted so the case could at least proceed against the other defendants. Ms. Stern’s bankruptcy was finally discharged and the case continued against her with the main issue being Ms. Stern’s refusal to turn over her computer and electronic media to the Special Master. Later on, when Ms. Harrington was sent to jail, somehow Ms. Stern got the notion that there was an arrest warrant out for her so she made arrangements to ship her computers to Mr. Ball. She like others was told not to tamper with her computer but she did not comply.  Forensic Expert Mr. Ball to whom she finally sent her computers to because she thought she was going to be arrested examined her media and using very strong language said that deliberate deleting of material had taken place. Judge Lindsay agreed and granted Mr. McCabe’s request for a default judgment against Bonnie Stern as to liability which will be decided after the trial which is scheduled for the summer of 2010.

While Mr. McCabe was in California taking care of business concerning Bonnie Stern’s bankruptcy, he was in the neighborhood to see Howard K. Stern, Dr’s Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich’s arraignment on felony drug charges in connection with the death of Anna Nicole Smith.

It was also reported that Mr. McCabe and Don Clark were in the neighborhood to hear oral arguments for summary judgment for Cosby in Howard K. Stern vs Rita Cosby and Hatchette Books in New York. Only one rag mag covered the hearing and it was the New York Post. If you will remember their scurrilous article, “Now That’s Not Nice Granny”, they took a quote from Lin Wood who is the attorney for Howard K. Stern in the Cosby case. Apparently the writer took something out of context that Judge Chin, who was presiding on this case said, with Stern’s attorney Wood embellishing upon it.  The line from The Post said, “One point that I find troubling is that Anna Nicole Smith would entertain herself by watching this videotape, said Chin.”

A more accurate depiction I am told, would be Judge Denny Chin was confounded as to why a woman would want to repeatedly watch two people she supposedly had been intimate with “getting it on”.

As people who follow these inter-related Anna Nicole Smith cases know, there has been some pretty creative lawyering on both sides of the fence. One of them was when Attorney Lin Wood for Howard K. Stern was filing a sworn statement he elicited from Nelda Turner a defendant in the Texas State case with almost all the courts where Stern had cases. Well oops, apparently Wood did not keep up with the facts in what is called the “blogger case” because he ended up withdrawing what he filed.

I have not been following Stern’s case against Ford Shelley and G. Ben Thompson closely but did have an opportunity to read some of the latest and will reserve my thoughts for when more information is available because it appears to me that the two men may be doing some back peddling. When only snippets are presented in the legal documents, it’s hard to see what is really going on.  I do know this though. Thompson and Shelley have apparently turned over what they had which belongs to the estate of Anna Nicole Smith. I suppose the question now will be if the estate been damaged or not. Again, case followers have seen items that are purported to have belonged to Anna Nicole Smith for sale on Ebay with the seller being out of California, not South Carolina where Shelley and Thompson reside. I’ll leave the rest to your imagination.

Finally, in the Harris County “blogger case”, Arthur vs Stern et al, another defendant is trying to circumvent the system and not obey a court order and this is even after Harrington did jail time and Bonnie Stern had a default judgment declared against her in the same case.

Teresa Stephens was ordered in early May of this year to turn over her “electronic media” aka computer, any exterior drives etc…  and it still has not happened. She informed the court that she would be present at a hearing that she scheduled on July 17th along with other motions in the same case that were to be heard that day. According to published reports, Judge Lindsay was ready to issue a warrant when Stephens did not show up but Mrs. Arthur’s attorney said he was informed that Stephens had filed an appeal that may have stayed any proceedings against her so he opted to give Stephens a break to “wait and see”. However, when Mr. McCabe contacted the clerk for the appellate court, he was informed they have received no such document.

McCabe filed a motion denying statements Stephens had made to the court and requested a Capias order. An order for the arrest of Theresa Stephens has now been issued with Arthur being charged a $3000 bond for the cost of bringing Ms. Stephens from where she lives around Dallas Texas to Houston.

Also in Harris County, there was a July 31st hearing scheduled for Larry Birkhead’s Special Appearance but that will be rescheduled for a later time.

While I have been offline, I was sad to see the news about the death of Michael Jackson. I grew up with his music and along with my children thought he was an exceptional entertainer. Another troubling aspect of his death is the similarity to what happened to Anna Nicole Smith and her son Daniel. In fact, the last person to see Michael alive was a Houston Texas doctor and as more facts come to light, I’m hearing the term, “death by entourage” used over and over again. It has been interesting and gratifying to see the state of California and other agencies aggressively pursuing this tragic case. It will be interesting to see how this case affects the felony drug charges brought against Howard K. Stern and Dr’s Kapoor and Eroshevich.

Also notable is the fact that Mrs. Virgie Arthur was declared next of kin in the California criminal case due to Proposition 9 which is also called Marsey’s Law. I’ll save writing about that for another day.

Hearings continue in Houston in the Conspiracy to Defame case brought by Plaintiff Virgie Arthur against Defendants Howard K. Stern, Bonnie Stern, Larry Birkhead, Art Harris, Harvey Levin, TMZ, Nelda “Rose” Turner, Lyndal Harrington, and Teresa Stephens.  Attorney for the Plaintiff, Neil McCabe, and his colleagues are currently embroiled in a contentious battle to have defendants turn over their computers and electronic media for forensic analysis, a process through which data and documents, such as emails, can be retrieved and judged for their relevancy and discoverable value.

The Hearing on Thursday starts at 8:00AM and is expected to last three hours.  Defendants Bonnie Stern and Lyndal Harrington or their respective representatives are each expected to face the judge to present an argument as to the reason the defendant should not be held in contempt for not turning in hard drives to Special Master Craig Ball when the Court first issued the order.  At the conclusion of the previous hearing in Houston’s 280th District Court, McCabe handed two documents to Judge Lindsay for her signature.  These were the motions to compel Misses Stern and Harrington to appear on Thursday, May 21.

Lyndal Harrington had first claimed her PC was destroyed when Hurricane Ike flooded her residence, but later discovered it was still operational.  Shortly thereafter, she claimed her PC was stolen during a break-in.  Mr. McCabe intends to prove the falsity of Miss Harrington’s claim by presenting in court a statement authored by the responding policeman which purports that the break-in appeared to the officer as having been staged to look like a burglary.

Bonnie Stern filed bankruptcy in California just prior to the deadline by which she was supposed to turn in her computer.  Because of the way the laws are written, the bankruptcy filing brought Virgie’s entire Texas State case to a halt.  In legal terms, Miss Stern’s bankruptcy filing placed a “stay” on Virgie’s case.  Because of the stay, Mr. McCabe’s legal pursuit to compel the defendants to abide by Court’s ruling with respect to producing their hard drives immediately drew to a halt.  However, McCabe went to California and filed a motion to Lift the Stay that Miss Stern caused.  His motion was heard and he won.  Stern appealed the Lifting of the Stay and the court struck her down without benefit of an argument from Mr. McCabe.

Bonnie Stern will still have to answer the Court when Judge Lindsay asks her why she shouldn’t be held in contempt for disobeying the court’s previous order demanding she turn in her PC.  McCabe may argue the surreptitious nature of the bankruptcy action by claiming it was nothing more than a delay tactic.

Most notably, Thursday’s appearance of Bonnie Stern and Lyndal Harrington appears to be the “one last chance” that Judge Lyndsay mentioned in last Friday’s hearing.  What lay ahead for Miss Stern and Miss Harrington will most assuredly depend on how convincing their arguments are to Judge Lindsay’s ears.  The hearing should be very interesting.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harrington_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

*Update*

According tp the latest documents filed by Ms. Stern,  she will not apppear at the hearing. Also, the police officer in Lyndal Harrington’s part of the lawsuit will attend and testify at the May 21st hearing about the burglary Harrington alleges happened.

Defendant_Bonnie_Stern_Answer_to_Show_Cause.pdf

Bonnie_Stern_Declaration_with_exhibit_1.pdf

Bonnie_Stern_Declaration_Exhibit_4.pdf

Bonnie_Stern_Declaration_Exhibit_5.pdf

The decisions made today by the Honorable Judge Lindsay relate to parts 1 and 3 of Virgie Arthur’s attorney Neil McCabe’s requests for production from last fall in her defamation and conspiracy to defame lawsuit against the parties below.

Howard K. Stern and Teresa Stephens must give their computers to Forensic Examiner  Craig Ball by 10 days after today’s order is signed. The order is expected to be signed by Monday.

Art Harris must give his hard drive to  Craig Ball by May 19. There are contempt and other sanctions possible if he does not comply or if he deleted anything from his computer.

Nelda Turner is given until May 22nd to produce what she has withheld.

Lyndal Harrington and Bonnie Stern are to appear in court on May 21 to show cause why they should not be held in contempt.  They were not present at today’s hearing and neither was Teresa Stephens.

Next court date is Monday at 3:00 pm on the proposed orders.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Harrington_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_Order_to_Show_Cause_Contempt.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Arthur_Response_Sterns_Motion_to_Cancel_050709.pdf

Judge Lindsay held a telephone conference today as a result of the emergency hearing filed by Howard K. Stern’s counsel Lin Wood.

Judge Lindsay will not hear the motion for sanctions. She said since it involves the recusal which was denied, the issue should be brought before Judge Underwood.

Tomorrow Judge Lindsay said she will hear the motion of Art Harris to “clarify” the order to turn over his computer. Also she will decide whether and when to hear the motions for contempt on Bonnie Stern, Art Harris, and Lyndal Harrington.

Judge Lindsay will also hear the motions to compel Howard K. Stern and Teresa Stephens and Nelda Turner to turn over their computers.

The Judge said she will not hear Teresa’s motions (injunction, whatever), because it has not been properly served to the required parties.

One more note;

Bonnie Stern’s motion for reconsideration has been DENIED by the California bankruptcy judge and this was done before McCabe could file any opposition.

And a reminder;

The motion to compel Bonnie Stern was granted in January.

Things are really heating up in the interconnected lawsuits which have resulted since the death of Anna Nicole Smith.

In Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern journalist Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin,  Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner, attorney’s for Virgie Arthur filed a second motion for sanctions against defendant Howard K. Stern and his counsel Lin Wood and a motion for contempt against Lin Wood.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Motion_Sanctions__Contempt_HStern_Wood.pdf

Bonnie Stern, a defendant in the above suit, in California filed a motion to Reconsider the Order Granting Relief from the Automatic Stay in the bankruptcy she filed after this case commenced. In the meantime Arthur filed a motion for contempt against her in Texas.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Contempt_motion_Bonnie_Stern.pdf

Thanks to Carole for the California documents.

Bonnie Stern’s Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Relief from Automatic Stay
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSMotReconsider.pdf

McCabe’s Court appearance transcript
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSExh2.pdf

Complaint for Determintation of Non-dischageable Debt under Chapter 11
http://www.angelfire.com/teamtexas-virgie/BSExh3.pdf
********************

**New Docs!**

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_for_Emergency_Hearing_on_Motion_to_Cancel-Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Stern_Motion_to_Cancel-Continue_May08_hearing.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Response_to_Harris_Motion_to_Clarify.pdf

After a flurry of motions, sworn statements and joinders,  Administrative Judge Olen Underwood denied Howard K. Sterns motion to recuse Judge Tony Lindsay who was presiding over the case of Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern, and others.

Mrs. Arthur filed a conspiracy and defamation case that was originally assigned to the 190th District Court in Harris County Texas. The case saw no action so it was moved to the 280th District and the Honorable Judge Tony Lindsay in September of 2008.

In December of 2008, four of the defendants lost their attorney due to various reasons. Some gave the reason of lack of funds, other reasons given were conflict of interest. Either before or shortly after, one defendant, Nelda Turner decided she wanted out of the lawsuit and contacted Mrs. Arthurs attorney Neil McCabe and began to turn over evidence.

Turner has stated on her website she turned over five to six DVD’s full of emails to McCabe concerning the bloggers, defendants and witnesses in this case and publicly wrote a statement of cooperation. Suddenly Turner came up with an attorney, reneiged on whatever agreements she had with counsel for Arthur, gave a sworn statement that was in direct opposition to emails revealed between herself and McCabe and statements she made on her website.

Howard K. Stern’s counsel Lin Wood filed a motion to recuse the judge on the case apparently based upon statements made by Turner and a rumor of ex-parte communications between McCabe, Judge Lindsay and Judge Wise who was the one who moved the case.

Sources who attended the hearing today say that when Judge Underwood asked for evidence of Judge Lindsay’s misconduct from Attorney Luke Lantta who was filling in for Lin Wood, he did not have any actual evidence other than Turners statement. Underwood ruled “motion denied”.

The case was previously stayed by defendant Bonnie Stern filing bankruptcy but McCabe for Arthur filed a motion with the bankruptcy court in California and got the stay lifted.

Now the case can continue and it promises to be quite interesting as it involves not only Mrs. Arthur, the mother of the late Anna Nicole Smith but Smith’s companion and attorney Howard K. Stern, journalist and CNN coorespondant Art Harris, TMZ and its managing editor Harvey Levin, the father of Anna Nicole’s infant daughter, Larry Birkhead, Sterns sister Bonnie and two bloggers Lyndal Harrington, Teresa Stephens and a blog owner Nelda Turner.

Yours truly is a witness in the case as well as another blogger Chrystal Baker who goes by the moniker Havana. If I am able to provide anymore details, Ill update this page.

Signed order denying recusal of Judge

**Updates**

Lack of evidence was indeed the reason for the ruling today and Judge Lindsay will be presiding again, because Judge Underwood signed the order denying recusal.

Before Mrs. Arthur can proceed against Bonnie Stern, the bankruptcy judge in California must sign the order reflecting his ruling from the bench. Ms. Stern can appeal that ruling if she so desires.

The issue of sanctions was postponed due to Stern’s attorney Lin Wood’s absence and will be addressed at a later time.

To explain the issue about Judge Wise and the transfer of the case; An affidavit was admitted into evidence from Judge Wise, saying that, after Mr. McCabe filed his motion to reconsider the transfer of the case from Judge Kerrigan (190th) to Judge Lindsay (280th) (in other words, McCabe’s motion asked Judge Wise to send the case back to Judge Kerrigan), Judge Wise asked both other judges what they thought of the motion to reconsider transfer. Judge Lindsay responded by email, and Judge Wise had already decided not to grant the motion to reconsider.  Apparently before Judge Wise could deny the motion, McCabe withdrew it. Everything was done  properly. Judge Wise was not present at the hearing.

Wood let Luke Lantta, a four-year lawyer, take the bullet for him.  Also present was Herring, managing partner of the Dallas Bryan Cave office, who let Mr. Lantta take the loss.

Howard K. Stern was not present. Lyndal Harrington was. Attorney Mike Meyer handled the hearing. McCabe was of course present and testified. Attorney John O’Quinn was present, and so was Don Clark. Mr. McCabe’s paralegal Patti Lampton was there, and Jonathan Stoger, another O’Quinn lawyer who has helped with Mrs. Arthur’s case was there too. So was WV.

Defendant Art Harris had Chip Babcock to carry and fumble the ball; also Amanda Bush, and Nancy Hamilton.

Nelda’s Turner’s lawyer was there as well. As far as what happens next, Judge Lindsay takes over so we wait and see.

Virgie Arthur’s attorney Neil McCabe was present in Los Angeles today to argue that Bonnie Stern’s bankruptcy stay should be lifted. The judge ruled from the bench to lift the stay.

Now the defamation and conspiracy case  of Virgie Arthur vs Howard K. Stern,  Art Harris, Larry Birkhead,  Lyndal Harrington,  Nelda Turner,  TMZ, Harvey Levin and  Teresa Stephens in Harris County Texas can continue.

Watch here for updates and documents regarding the lifting of the stay.

Bonnie Stern filed her response to Virgie Arthur’s motion for relief of Stern’s bankruptcy stay and today Arthur filed her response.

Neil McCabe, attorney for Virgie Arthur found some problems with Bonnie Stern’s response. Her attorney, Theodore Roberts incorrectly writes “the case apparently involves control of Anna Nicole Smith’s infant child and heir.”  McCabe counters that the suit is about defamation and conspiracy. Not about Anna Nicole and baby Dannielynn.

Mr. Roberts also says that Ms. Stern was blindsided without counsel concerning turning her computer over but if you follow this story and read the transcript from the December 11th, 2008 hearing, Ms. Stern’s attorney at the time, William Odgen took a recess and placed a phone call to Ms. Stern where she agreed to have her computer imaged with the stipulation that her business records are protected. Stern’s counsel also choose the “Special Master”, Craig Ball to do the work, a process that takes less than one day. Mr.Ogden even helped draft the paperwork requiring Ms. Stern to turn over her computer.

Its also clear that contrary to Mr. Roberts statement, Judge Lindsay in the Harris County case did not threaten to dismiss the entire action. A standard  document generated and adjusted by the court when a bankruptcy is filed says that claims against the debtor will be dismissed if one of  four listed actions are not taken.  There was never a threat to dismiss the entire case.

A hearing for the motion to lift the bankruptcy stay will be held tomorrow in Los Angeles.

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_BR_response_to_motion_for_relief.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_reply_relief_of_Bonnie_Stern_BR_stay_McCabe_declaration.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_BR_exhibit_4.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_BR_exhibit_5.pdf

Arthur_vs_Stern_etal_Bonnie_Stern_BR_exhibit_6.pdf