The good news from a source close to Mr. O’Quinn is that his legacy will live on. The O’Quinn Law Firm will continue to grow and prosper. All cases currently in litigation will be vigorously pursued to a successful outcome and that especially includes all the cases associated with the life and death of Anna Nicole Smith.
You Never Know What Will Happen Next
Please Click Every Day To Feed A Hungry Stray Animal. Its Free!
QV's Chatbox
7250 spams blockedLast Message2 hours, 49 minutesago5 guests are online.- Info : Please, resolve the addition below before post any new comment...
- Guest_1483 : It would be good if it is her remains, especially for her family. Odds are against it though it seems. We will have to wait and see. JMO
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_4136 : I hope that poor family gets some closure.
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Natalie Holloway's body may have been discovered! Don't know yet if it is or isn't, could be a hoax. JMO
- Guest_4417 : interesting: Vickie’s counterclaim was not related to the bankruptcy, because she had already been discharged and her creditors would get none of the money she sought from Pierce in her counterclaim; (3rd guy)
- Guest_1483 : I doubt it. She will still be the Daughter of ANS. Eventually though interest in her will wane. I don't know what some will do for money then. JMO
- Guest_3736 : maybe they will stop taking pics of DL now that she is not an heiress and she will lead a more normal life out of the public eye
- Guest_1483 :
- Guest_2588 : Rose doesn't let little details bother her Guest 1483...it was a lot to read LOL
- Guest_1483 : With no dissenting opinion, only a concurring it would be 3-0 decision as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : I wonder where 'Rose' is getting the idea it was a 2-1 decision. There wasn't any dissenting opinion that I saw. There was the majority opinion which would be the two and then a concurring opinion that went further it appeared. So that makes it appear all 3 agreed with the main majority opinion as I understand it. JMO
- Guest_1483 : Yeah, the last thing I know about and is on the site is the notice of the change of date for Harris' hearing.
- Guest_1483 : Okay.
- QV : All I know is that the email is bouncing. No conversation about what is contained in the filing.
- Guest_1483 : He didn't tell you what the filing is? Or you learned it from someone else?
- QV : There is a filing made today in HC but anyone with Yahoo mail is not receiving it due to bounce backs. I don't know what the filing is though.
- Guest_1483 : QV when you talked to McCabe was there any updates on the other cases? TIA
- Guest_1483 : I agree with 1718 also.
- Guest_1483 : From what is being written here if accurate in regards to what 'swim's is saying, apparently he didn't understand the Supreme Court ruling and doesn't understand the current ruling, or didn't read it. The current ruling did mention the Supreme Court decision. LOL/JMO
- QV : I vote with you!
- Guest_1718 : prediction: no en banc rehearing and supremes won't take it
- QV : I think the estate is insolvent with more creditors than money.
- Guest_001 : You too QV
- QV : Ok 001. Talk to you then. Take care.
- Guest_3818 : there were a lot of attornies working on that case a long with Richard Kent. I think one of them was a British attorney also that wrote a filing to the Supreme Court
- Guest_3818 : probably...isn't is a lot of Anna's attornies that will still
it to get what they claimed in her Estate as a credit claim? - Guest_001 : I will write you up an email to catch you up. It has been a heck of a winter and I am so looking forward to spring
- QV : Glad to hear that. Yes, its been a long time but some of us are still hanging in there.
- Guest_001 : Good! it's been a while I know..lol
- QV : In the 9th circuit.
- QV : That's what I'm thinking too. They had their run at that court but McCabe said they can ask for a re-hearing.
- Guest_218 : the supremes will refuse to take it
- QV : Hi Girl! How are you doing?
- Guest_001 : Hi QV! I just saw the news and had to drop in to see it here
- QV : Does anyone think that HKS attorneys will spend any more money on this case?
- QV : For Swims:
- Guest_1356 : The tortured arguments used to declare that the ANS – Pierce Marshall claim/counter-cl aim was not a core proceeding (easy way out for the 9th) fail to justify how the 9th feels the will of Congress (clearly written) can be intellectually ignored as if unconstitutional . Another issue for SCOTUS
- QV : Oh does he think HKS case is important enough to change the rule of the United States Supreme Court? Once again, ROFLMAO!
- Guest_1356 : 184. No wonder the 9th is the most reversed U.S. Appeals Court in America • Two months shy of three years after SCOTUS spoke for that thin opinion to arrive. • Old arguments and case law rehashed but not a word about the ANS SCOTUS details
- Guest_1356 : Swims is pissed at the Ninth Circuit. He used to say they would "get it right". Now he says that SCOTUS will have to amend and rule on things that the Ninth keeps making mistakes on.
- QV : Another update is on the article with some info about appeal procedures.
- QV : Hahaa..Lol!
- Guest_4942 : very funny that "swims" is having a breakdown LOL
- QV : Swims said Pierce robbed his father while he was alive. His father intended for Pierce to inherit his estate so even if he did take anything, it was his to take.
- QV : ....and forum shopping.
- QV : Well, the 9th Circuit has spoken. Marshall gave all he was going to during his life. The court is not going to disavow the wishes of the deceased. The court agreed with the Marshall family. The probate court ruled correctly and anything after that is dust in the wind.....
- QV : Ok TY
- Guest_3371 : yeah, go read his post. he says they ignored Scotus telling the ninth coa that the probate and bankruptcy were seperate core proceedings and they should rule on the other one and not the probate one.
- QV : Who got it wrong? The 9th Circuit?
- Guest_3371 : Swims posted and said they got it wrong.
- Guest_1483 : Hopefully any appeal will be quickly turned down against HKS. JMO
- Guest_4501 : that last link has a comment from Elaine's attorney and says it could be appealed to the Supreme Court. will it ever end?
- Guest_4501 : «link»
- Guest_4501 : «link»
- Guest_1483 : Basically the TX probate decision is the controlling ruling regarding ANS's claims of a gift. So she loses. JMO
- Guest_1483 : The decision is a bit long winded and has some legal jargon but for the most part is understandable. JMO
- Guest_4501 : It's on google news now with some articles. Maybe those will go more in depth later on with legal professionals weighing in.
- Guest_1483 : Yes I saw. They are taking liberties I believe in their wording. Basically because the 9th circuit ruled that the TX probate ruling is the controlling final judgment. Either that or they don't understand where the District Court is located. LOL/JMO
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.